...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electrocardiology: An International Publication for the Study of the Electrical Activities of the Heart >Reproducibility of time-domain and three different frequency-domain techniques for the analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
【24h】

Reproducibility of time-domain and three different frequency-domain techniques for the analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

机译:时域和三种不同频域技术的重现性,用于分析信号平均心电图。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Because time-domain (TD) analysis of the signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) has some limitations that limit its use, several frequency-domain analysis techniques were developed in an attempt to improve the diagnostic ability of the SAECG. However, it is not known how reliable these techniques are at detecting late potentials. This prospective study compares the short-term reproducibility of 4 analysis techniques: TD analysis, spectral temporal mapping (STM), spectral turbulence analysis (STA), and acceleration spectrum analysis (ASA), in a large series of normal patients and post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Two consecutive SAECGs were recorded in 634 patients that were divided into 3 groups: 117 remote MI patients undergoing programmed electrical stimulation for the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (Group 1), 407 consecutive acute MI survivors (Group 2), and in 110 healthy volunteers (Group 3). The diagnostic reproducibility of the 4 techniques was evaluated by comparing rates of inconsistent results (1 normal and the other abnormal). The numeric reproducibility for each technique was assessed by comparing the normalized differences of each single SAECG parameter between the 2 recordings. Inconsistent results of diagnostic reproducibility were observed in 4.1%, 6.9%, 9.8%, and 18.0%, with TD, STA, ASA, and STM, respectively. Comparisons of these rates were significantly different (P < .05) except between STA and ASA (P = .07). The numeric reproducibility was highest for TD parameters, lowest for STM factors of normality, and intermediate for STA and ASA indices. TD analysis remains the most reproducible SAECG analysis technique, whereas STM showed the worst reproducibility, which limits its clinical applicability. STA and ASA provide an acceptable intermediate reproducibility, the former being slightly, although not significantly, more reproducible than the latter.
机译:由于信号平均ECG(SAECG)的时域(TD)分析具有某些局限性,限制了其使用,因此开发了几种频域分析技术,以提高SAECG的诊断能力。但是,还不知道这些技术在检测后期电势方面的可靠性如何。这项前瞻性研究在一系列正常患者和心肌后患者中比较了四种分析技术的短期重现性:TD分析,光谱时间图谱(STM),光谱湍流分析(STA)和加速光谱分析(ASA)。梗死(MI)患者。在634例患者中记录了两个连续的SAECG,将其分为3组:117例因室性心动过速的诱发性而接受程序性电刺激的远程MI患者(第1组),407例连续的急性MI幸存者(第2组)以及110例健康志愿者(第3组)。通过比较不一致结果的比率(一种是正常的,另一种是异常的),评估了这四种技术的诊断可重复性。通过比较两个记录之间每个单个SAECG参数的归一化差异,评估了每种技术的数字重现性。使用TD,STA,ASA和STM的诊断重现性结果不一致,分别为4.1%,6.9%,9.8%和18.0%。除STA和ASA之间的差异外,这些比率的比较差异显着(P <.05)(P = .07)。对于TD参数,数值可重复性最高,对于STM正态性系数,数值可重复性最低,对于STA和ASA指数,其中间值。 TD分析仍然是SAECG分析方法中可重复性最高的技术,而STM分析方法则具有最差的可重复性,从而限制了其临床适用性。 STA和ASA提供了可接受的中间重现性,前者比后者略有(尽管不明显)重现性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号