首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Comparison of signal-averaged electrocardiograms with different levels of noise: time-domain, frequency-domain, and spectrotemporal analysis.
【24h】

Comparison of signal-averaged electrocardiograms with different levels of noise: time-domain, frequency-domain, and spectrotemporal analysis.

机译:比较具有不同噪声水平的信号平均心电图:时域,频域和频谱时态分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to test the effect of noise on the various parameters of the SAECG, 83 patients underwent three consecutive recordings at different noise levels. The high noise (HN) recordings had a noise level of 0.60-0.74 microV, the intermediate noise (IN) had 0.31-0.59 microV, and the low noise (LN) had < or = 0.30 microV. For the calculation of noise we used the standard deviation of the mean noise of the composite lead high pass filtered at 40 Hz. The recordings were compared using time-domain, frequency-domain, and spectrotemporal analysis. The time-domain parameters of the LN recordings, using 25-Hz, 40-Hz, and 60-Hz high pass cutoffs, were significantly different from those of the HN or IN recordings (P < 0.05). In the frequency-domain analysis, significant differences were found in some of the parameters of the LN compared to the HN. The spectrotemporal analysis of the X and Z leads also showed significant differences among the LN and the other recordings. In the time-domain analysis, both at 40 Hz and 25 Hz, there were more abnormal LN compared to the HN recordings (P < 0.05). In the spectrotemporal analysis, there were significantly more abnormal HN and IN recordings compared to the LN (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Therefore, the level of noise, even within the acceptable range, can significantly affect the SAECG. In the time domain at the lower noise levels the parameters become more abnormal, while the opposite seems to occur in the spectral and the spectrotemporal analysis.
机译:为了测试噪声对SAECG各个参数的影响,对83名患者进行了连续三次不同噪声水平的记录。高噪声(HN)记录的噪声水平为0.60-0.74 microV,中间噪声(IN)的噪声水平为0.31-0.59 microV,低噪声(LN)的噪声水平≤0.30 microV。为了计算噪声,我们使用了以40 Hz滤波的复合铅高通平均噪声的标准偏差。使用时域,频域和光谱时间分析来比较记录。使用25 Hz,40 Hz和60 Hz高通截止频率的LN录音的时域参数与HN或IN录音的时域参数显着不同(P <0.05)。在频域分析中,与HN相比,LN的某些参数存在显着差异。 X和Z引线的时空分析也显示LN和其他记录之间存在显着差异。在时域分析中,在40 Hz和25 Hz时,与HN记录相比,存在更多的LN异常(P <0.05)。在光谱时间分析中,与LN相比,HN和IN的异常记录要多得多(分别为P <0.001和P <0.01)。因此,即使在可接受的范围内,噪声水平也会严重影响SAECG。在较低噪声水平的时域中,参数变得更加异常,而在频谱和光谱时域分析中似乎出现了相反的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号