...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Evaluation of two approaches to characterise liquid chromatographic columns using pharmaceutical separations
【24h】

Evaluation of two approaches to characterise liquid chromatographic columns using pharmaceutical separations

机译:评价使用药物分离技术表征液相色谱柱的两种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper a comparison of two column characterisation systems is reported: the method based on the hydrophobic-subtraction model of Dolan and Snyder (HS method) versus the method developed at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL method). Comparison was done for seven different pharmaceutical separations (fluoxetine, gemcitabine, erythromycin, tetracycline, tetracaine, amlodipine and bisacodyl), using a set of 59 columns. A ranking was built based on an Fvalue (KUL) or F_s value (HS) versus a (virtual) reference column. Both methods showed similar probabilities of ranking patterns. Correlation of the respective test parameters of both approaches was poor. Both methods are not perfect and do not match well, but anyhow yield results which allow, with a relatively high certainty, the selection of similar or dissimilar columns as compared to a reference column. An analyst that uses either of the two methods will end up with a similar probability to choose an adequate column. From a practical point of view, it must be noted that the KUL method is easier to use.
机译:本文报道了两种色谱柱表征系统的比较:基于Dolan和Snyder疏水减法模型的方法(HS方法)与由鲁汶大学(KULholieke鲁汶大学)开发的方法(KUL方法)。使用一组59根色谱柱比较了七种不同的药物分离物(氟西汀,吉西他滨,红霉素,四环素,丁卡因,氨氯地平和比沙可啶)。基于Fvalue(KUL)或F_s值(HS)相对于(虚拟)参考列建立排名。两种方法都显示出相似的排名模式概率。两种方法各自的测试参数的相关性很差。两种方法都不是完美的并且不能很好地匹配,但是无论如何,产生的结果允许以相对较高的确定性选择与参考色谱柱相比相似或不相似的色谱柱。使用两种方法中的任何一种的分析师最终选择相似色谱柱的可能性都差不多。从实践的角度来看,必须注意的是,KUL方法更易于使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号