首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >The postoperative analgesic efficacy of wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.1% versus ropivacaine 0.2%.
【24h】

The postoperative analgesic efficacy of wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.1% versus ropivacaine 0.2%.

机译:罗哌卡因0.1%vs罗哌卡因0.2%创面滴注的术后镇痛效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of ropivacaine concentration on wound instillation-induced postoperative analgesia following total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. INTERVENTIONS: A standard general anesthetic was administered. In all cases surgery was performed via a Pfannenstiel incision. On completion of the surgery, a multi-orifice, 20-gauge epidural catheter was placed above the fascia such that the tip was sited at the point that demarcated 50% of the length of the surgical wound. Thereafter, the catheter was connected to an electronic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device programmed to deliver 9 mL of drug, with a lockout time of 60 minutes and no basal infusion. Patients were randomized to receive PCA with ropivacaine 0.1% (Group 0.1) or ropivacaine 0.2% (Group 0.2). During the first 6 postoperative hours, a co-investigator administered "rescue" morphine (2 mg IV). Thereafter, "rescue" meperidine 1 mg/kg was administered on patient request. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The number of attempts to activate the PCA device and actual PCA instillations during the 24 hour study period were similar between the groups. The number of 2 mg "rescue" morphine dosages administered was 4.3 +/- 1.7 versus 4.4 +/- 2.5 for the Group 0.1 and Group 0.2, respectively. For Group 0.1 and Group 0.2, the total dose of "rescue" morphine administered during the first 6 postoperative hours was 8.7 mg +/- 3.6 versus 9.1 mg +/- 5, respectively. Rescue similar between the groups. Throughout the study period, pain scores were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: With a pre-set volume, varying the concentration of ropivacaine (0.1% versus 0.2%) does not affect the analgesic efficacy of wound instillation following total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
机译:研究目的:评估罗哌卡因浓度对双侧输卵管卵巢切除术全腹子宫切除术后伤口滴注引起的术后镇痛的影响。设计:前瞻性,随机,双盲研究。地点:大型转诊医院。患者:40例ASA状况I和II的患者,分别接受了全腹子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。干预:使用标准的全身麻醉剂。在所有情况下,均通过Pfannenstiel切口进行手术。手术完成后,将一根20口径多孔硬膜外导管放置在筋膜上方,使尖端位于划定手术伤口长度50%的点。此后,将导管连接到电子患者控制镇痛(PCA)设备,该设备编程为可输送9 mL药物,锁定时间为60分钟,且无基础输注。患者随机接受0.1%罗哌卡因(0.1组)或0.2%罗哌卡因(0.2组)的PCA。在术后的前6个小时中,一位共同研究者服用了“救援”吗啡(2毫克静脉注射)。此后,应患者要求给予“抢救” 1 mg / kg的哌替啶。测量和主要结果:在24小时的研究期间,激活PCA装置的尝试次数和实际的PCA滴注次数在两组之间相似。给予的2 mg“救援”吗啡剂量为4.3 +/- 1.7,而0.1组和0.2组分别为4.4 +/- 2.5。对于第0.1组和第0.2组,在术后最初6个小时内施用的“救援”吗啡总剂量分别为8.7 mg +/- 3.6和9.1 mg +/- 5。两组之间的救援相似。在整个研究期间,两组之间的疼痛评分相似。结论:以预设的体积,改变罗哌卡因的浓度(0.1%对0.2%)不会影响双侧输卵管卵巢切除术联合全腹子宫切除术后滴注的镇痛效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号