首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Phase II study of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy or erlotinib compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of recurrent or refractory non small-cell lung cancer.
【24h】

Phase II study of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy or erlotinib compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of recurrent or refractory non small-cell lung cancer.

机译:贝伐单抗联合化疗或厄洛替尼与单独化疗相比治疗复发或难治性非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性的第二阶段研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab, a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, and erlotinib, a reversible, orally available epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, have demonstrated evidence of a survival benefit in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A single-arm phase I and II study of bevacizumab plus erlotinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy, with a favorable safety profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial evaluated the safety of combining bevacizumab with either chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed) or erlotinib and preliminarily assessed these combinations versus chemotherapy alone, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS). All patients had histologically confirmed nonsquamous NSCLC that had progressed during or after one platinum-based regimen. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned and treated. No unexpected adverse events were noted. Fewer patients (13%) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib arm discontinued treatment as a result of adverse events than in the chemotherapy alone (24%) or bevacizumab-chemotherapy (28%) arms. The incidence of grade 5 hemorrhage in patients receiving bevacizumab was 5.1%. Although not statistically significant, relative to chemotherapy alone, the risk of disease progression or death was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.38 to 1.16) among patients treated with bevacizumab-chemotherapy and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.23) among patients treated with bevacizumab-erlotinib. One-year survival rate was 57.4% for bevacizumab-erlotinib and 53.8% for bevacizumab-chemotherapy compared with 33.1% for chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: Results for PFS and overall survival favor combination of bevacizumab with either chemotherapy or erlotinib over chemotherapy alone in the second-line setting. No unexpected safety signals were noted. The rate of fatal pulmonary hemorrhage was consistent with previous bevacizumab trials. The toxicity profile of the bevacizumab-erlotinib combination isfavorable compared with either chemotherapy-containing group.
机译:目的:贝伐单抗(一种人源化抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体)和厄洛替尼(一种可逆的,可口服的表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)已证明在治疗非小细胞肺癌中具有生存获益的证据( NSCLC)。贝伐单抗联合厄洛替尼的单臂I和II期研究显示出令人鼓舞的疗效,并具有良好的安全性。患者与方法:一项多中心随机II期临床试验评估了贝伐单抗联合化疗(多西他赛或培美曲塞)或厄洛替尼或厄洛替尼联合治疗的安全性,并通过无进展生存期(PFS)初步评估了这些联合治疗与单纯化疗的安全性。所有患者均经组织学确认为非鳞状非小细胞肺癌,在一种铂类治疗方案期间或之后进展。结果:120例患者被随机分配并接受治疗。没有发现意外的不良事件。与不良反应相比,贝伐单抗-厄洛替尼组因不良事件而中止治疗的患者(13%)少于单独化疗(24%)或贝伐单抗-化学疗法(28%)组。贝伐单抗患者发生5级出血的发生率为5.1%。尽管无统计学意义,但相对于单纯化疗,在接受贝伐单抗化疗的患者中疾病进展或死亡的风险为0.66(95%CI,0.38至1.16),在接受贝伐单抗化学疗法的患者中为0.72(95%CI,0.42至1.23)。贝伐单抗-厄洛替尼。贝伐单抗-厄洛替尼的一年生存率为57.4%,贝伐单抗-化学疗法的一年生存率为53.8%,而单纯化疗的一年生存率为53.8%。结论:在二线治疗中,PFS和总体生存期的结果优于贝伐单抗联合化疗或厄洛替尼联合化疗。没有发现意外的安全信号。致命性肺出血的发生率与先前的贝伐单抗试验一致。贝伐单抗-厄洛替尼联合用药的毒性谱比任何一个含化学疗法的组都要好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号