...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Examining the Assumptions Underlying Continuum-Solvent Models
【24h】

Examining the Assumptions Underlying Continuum-Solvent Models

机译:检查连续体-溶剂模型基础的假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Continuum-solvent models (CSMs) have successfully predicted many quantities, including the solvation-free energies (Delta G) of small molecules, but they have not consistently succeeded at reproducing experimental binding free energies (Delta Delta G), especially for protein protein complexes. Several CSMs break Delta G into the free energy (Delta G(vdw)) of inserting an uncharged molecule into solution and the free energy (Delta G(el)) gained from charging. Some further divide Delta G(vdw) into the free energy (Delta G(rep)) of inserting a nearly hard cavity into solution and the free energy (Delta G(att)) gained from turning on dispersive interactions between the solute and solvent. We show that for 9 protein-protein complexes neither Delta G(rep) nor Delta G(vdw), was linear in the solvent-accessible area A, as assumed in many CSMs, and the corresponding components of Delta Delta G were not linear in changes in A. We show that linear response theory (LRT) yielded good estimates of Delta G(att) and Delta Delta G(att), but estimates of Delta Delta Gatt obtained from either the initial or final configurations of the solvent were not consistent with those from LRT. The LRT estimates of Delta G(el) differed by more than 100 kcal/mol from the explicit solvent model's (ESM's) predictions, and its estimates of the corresponding component (Delta Delta G(el)) of Delta Delta G differed by more than 10 kcal/mol. Finally, the Poisson-Boltzmann equation produced estimates of Delta G(el) that were correlated with those from the ESM, but its estimates of Delta Delta G(el) were much less so. These findings may help explain why many CSMs have not been consistently successful at predicting Delta Delta G for many complexes, including protein-protein complexes.
机译:连续溶剂模型(CSM)已成功预测了许多数量,包括小分子的无溶剂化能量(Delta G),但它们并不能始终如一地成功复制出实验性的结合自由能(Delta Delta G),尤其是蛋白质复合物。几个CSM将Delta G分解为将不带电荷的分子插入溶液中的自由能(Delta G(vdw)),以及从充电中获得的自由能(Delta G(el))。一些人进一步将Delta G(vdw)分为将近硬腔插入溶液的自由能(Delta G(rep))和通过打开溶质和溶剂之间的分散相互作用而获得的自由能(Delta G(att))。我们显示,对于9种蛋白质-蛋白质复合物,如许多CSM所假设,在溶剂可及区域A中,Delta G(rep)和Delta G(vdw)都不是线性的,而Delta Delta G的相应成分在A的变化。我们表明线性响应理论(LRT)对Delta G(att)和Delta Delta G(att)产生了良好的估计,但从溶剂的初始或最终构型获得的Delta Delta Gatt的估计值不一致与LRT的那些。 Delta G(el)的LRT估计值与显式溶剂模型(ESM)的预测值相差100 kcal / mol以上,并且其对Delta Delta G的相应组分(Delta Delta G(el))的估计值相差超过100 kcal / mol。 10大卡/摩尔最后,Poisson-Boltzmann方程产生的Delta G(el)估计值与ESM的估计值相关,但其Delta Delta G(el)的估计值却远不如此。这些发现可能有助于解释为什么许多CSM无法始终如一地成功预测许多复合物(包括蛋白质-蛋白质复合物)的Delta Delta G。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号