首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Electroanatomic characteristics of atrial premature beats triggering atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent versus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Electroanatomic characteristics of atrial premature beats triggering atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent versus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

机译:持续性阵发性房颤与阵发性心房颤动患者房性早搏的电解剖学特征触发房颤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

APBs in Persistent Versus Paroxysmal AF. Background: Although the electrical disconnection between the left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) by radiofrequency catheter ablation has been proven to be effective in controlling atrial fibrillation (AF), the recurrence rate is higher in patients with persistent AF (PeAF) than with paroxysmal AF (PAF). We hypothesized that the origin of the atrial premature beats (APBs) that trigger AF and the pattern of their breakthrough into the LA differ between PAF and PeAF. Methods: We mapped 75 APBs (53 APBs triggering AF, 22 isolated APBs) from the LA and PVs in 26 patients with AF (age: 49.5 +/- 9.6, males: 23, PAF = 17, PeAF = 9), using a noncontact endocardial mapping (NCM) system. The location of the preferential conduction (PC) sites and their conduction velocity (CV) were compared. Results: In patients with PeAF, the earliest activation (EA) site and exit of the PC were more frequently located on the LA side of the LA-PV junction as compared with PAF (P < 0.001). Eighty-one percent of the PCs were located in the area between the left and right superior PVs. The incidence of PCs was similar between the PeAF and PAF patients (P = NS). PCs were more commonly found with APBs inducing AF (63.3%) than with those not inducing AF (35.2%, P = 0.01). The CV of the PC was slower for PeAF than PAF (P < 0.001). The CV in the LA during sinus rhythm was also slower for PeAF than PAF (P < 0.01). Conclusion: PeAF was more frequently triggered by APBs from the LA side of the LA-PV junction than PAF and resulted in slower conduction than did PAF. These findings may help explain the higher potential for recurrence after electrical PV isolation in patients with PeAF.
机译:持续性和阵发性AF的APBs。背景:尽管已证明通过射频导管消融术在左心房(LA)和肺静脉(PVs)之间的电连接可有效控制房颤(AF),但持续性AF(PeAF)的复发率更高比阵发性AF(PAF)高。我们假设触发房颤的心房早搏(APB)的起源及其突入LA的模式在PAF和PeAF之间是不同的。方法:我们使用26位AF患者(年龄:49.5 +/- 9.6,男性:23,PAF = 17,PeAF = 9)从LA和PV中绘制了75个APB(53个触发AF的APB,22个分离的APB)。非接触心内膜测绘(NCM)系统。比较了优先传导(PC)位点的位置及其传导速度(CV)。结果:在PeAF患者中,与PAF相比,最早的激活(EA)部位和PC出口更常位于LA-PV连接的LA侧。 81%的PC位于左右上PV之间的区域。 PeAF和PAF患者之间的PC发生率相似(P = NS)。 APB诱发房颤的比例更高(63.3%),而不诱发房颤的比例更高(35.2%,P = 0.01)。 PeAF的PC的CV慢于PAF(P <0.001)。 PeAF的窦性心律在LA的CV也比PAF慢(P <0.01)。结论:PeAF是由LA-PV结的LA侧的APB触发的,而不是PAF触发的,其传导速度比PAF慢。这些发现可能有助于解释PeAF患者在电PV隔离后复发的可能性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号