...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Superior vena cava flutter: electrophysiology and ablation.
【24h】

Superior vena cava flutter: electrophysiology and ablation.

机译:上腔静脉扑动:电生理和消融。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Superior Vena Cava Flutter. Introduction: Reentry within a major thoracic vein has been suggested as a cause of atrial arrhythmias. However, little is known about these potential reentrant circuits. Methods and Results: Atypical atrial flutter was induced and mapped in 67 out of 225 atrial flutter ablation procedures. Reentry around the superior vena cava (SVC) was suspected in three patients. The suspected SVC flutter was induced and terminated by pacing in all patients. Fusion was demonstrated during flutter entrainment by subeustachian isthmus pacing in all of them. The postpacing interval following entrainment by pacing from different sites of the right atrium (RA) or coronary sinus was longer than the flutter cycle length. Macroreentry within the SVC was demonstrated both by sequential activation and a postpacing interval matching the flutter cycle length when pacing from different sites around the SVC in all patients. Atrial-venous-atrial electrogram sequence was demonstrated following flutter entrainment by atrial pacing. Flutter was terminated by an electrical stimulus delivered to the SVC, which was not propagated to the trabeculated RA, in one patient, and linear radiofrequency application from the distal SVC to the posterior wall of the RA, or to the superoseptal portion of the crista terminalis, in the other two. Conclusion: Macroreentry within the SVC is a distinctive mechanism responsible for rapid atrial activation, which is different from other reported flutter mechanisms, such as upper loop reentry. SVC longitudinal radiofrequency application can eliminate the arrhythmia without the need for complete electrical disconnection of the vein. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 16, pp. 1-8, June 2005).
机译:上等静脉腔颤振。简介:已建议在胸大静脉内再入是引起房性心律不齐的原因。但是,对这些潜在的折返电路知之甚少。方法和结果:在225例房扑消融手术中,有67例诱发了非典型房扑。怀疑三名患者进入上腔静脉(SVC)周围。所有患者均被怀疑起搏并诱发了SVC扑动。扑动夹带过程中,所有人均通过咽鼓管峡部起搏证实了融合。从右心房(RA)或冠状窦的不同部位起搏后夹带的后起搏间隔长于扑动周期长度。在所有患者中,当从SVC周围的不同部位起搏时,通过顺序激活和与扑动周期长度匹配的起搏后间隔,可以证明SVC内的大肠再入。通过心房起搏扑动扑扑后证实了心室-静脉-心电图序列。在一名患者中,通过向SVC传递电刺激(未传播至小梁RA)并从远端SVC到RA的后壁或terminal的超中隔部分施加线性射频,终止了颤振。 ,在另外两个中。结论:SVC内的大肠再入是引起心房快速激活的独特机制,与其他报道的扑动机制(例如上环再入)不同。 SVC纵向射频应用可以消除心律不齐,而无需完全断开静脉电连接。 (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,第16卷,第1-8页,2005年6月)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号