首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology >A comparison of various methods of measuring antidepressant medication adherence among children and adolescents with major depressive disorder in a 12-week open trial of fluoxetine.
【24h】

A comparison of various methods of measuring antidepressant medication adherence among children and adolescents with major depressive disorder in a 12-week open trial of fluoxetine.

机译:在一项为期12周的氟西汀公开试验中,对患有严重抑郁症的儿童和青少年中抗抑郁药物依从性的各种测量方法进行了比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined antidepressant (fluoxetine) medication adherence in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Using electronic monitoring (EM) as the "reference standard," we compared various methods of measuring antidepressant medication adherence (including EM, pill counts, and medication diaries) among children and adolescents with MDD and examined the relationship between EM medication adherence and depression severity across time. We then suggested recommendations for clinical researchers and practicing clinicians regarding medication adherence assessment. METHOD: Thirty-one child and adolescent outpatients with MDD who enrolled in a 12-week open trial of fluoxetine had their antidepressant medication adherence assessed at each visit, using EM, pill counts, and parent and patient medication diaries. Depression severity was assessed by the Children's Depression Rating Scales-Revised at each visit. RESULTS: Twelve-week least squares mean estimates of medication adherence for the entire sample was high, regardless of the adherence assessment method, although the overall adherence among the four methods (EM, pill, parent diary, patient diary) was significantly different (87.5% vs. 90.6% vs. 93.1% vs. 93.3%, respectively, p=0.0002). Adjusted mean symptom severity was significantly lower for the EM "adherent" group than for the EM "nonadherent" group over the 12 weeks of treatment (35.6 vs. 43.8, p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Overall, EM medication adherence for the depressed youth in this study is high. Compared with EM, there is a tendency of pill counts and medication diaries to overestimate medication adherence. However, pill count adherence better approximates EM adherence, and compliance with returning medication diaries is poor. Youth who are adherent to fluoxetine treatment have lower symptom severity over the course of treatment. Recommendations are provided.
机译:目的:在这项研究中,我们检查了患有严重抑郁症(MDD)的儿童和青少年的抗抑郁药(氟西汀)依从性。我们以电子监测(EM)作为“参考标准”,比较了测量MDD儿童和青少年中抗抑郁药物依从性的各种方法(包括EM,药丸计数和药物日记),并检查了EM药物依从性与抑郁严重程度之间的关系。跨越时间。然后,我们为临床研究人员和临床医生就药物依从性评估提出了建议。方法:参加氟西汀12周开放试验的31名MDD儿童和青少年门诊患者,在每次访视时均使用EM,药丸计数以及父母和患者用药日记评估了其抗抑郁药的依从性。抑郁症的严重程度通过每次访视时修订的《儿童抑郁量表》进行评估。结果:尽管依从性评估方法不同,但整个样本对药物依从性的十二周最小二乘估计均很高,尽管四种方法(EM,药丸,父母日记,患者日记)的总体依从性明显不同(87.5)分别为90.6%和93.1%和93.3%,分别为p = 0.0002)。在治疗的12周内,EM“贴壁”组的调整后平均症状严重程度显着低于EM“非贴壁”组(35.6 vs. 43.8,p = 0.008)。结论:总体而言,这项研究对抑郁青年的EM药物依从性很高。与EM相比,药丸计数和用药日记有高估用药依从性的趋势。但是,药丸计数依从性更好地接近于EM依从性,并且对返回药物日记的依从性较差。坚持氟西汀治疗的年轻人在治疗过程中症状严重程度较低。提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号