Heparinase thromboelastography compared with activated coagulation time for protamine titration after cardiopulmonary bypass

摘要

Objective The present study is a comparison of two point-of-care (POC) tests as endpoints of protamine titration after CPB. The authors hypothesized that using the heparinase-kaolin thromboelastography (TEG-HK) R-time difference would more readily identify residual heparin necessitating additional protamine than when using activated coagulation time (ACT). The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in protamine dose. Whether this approach would lessen postoperative bleeding and sequelae also was investigated. Design Single center, blinded, prospective, randomized study. Setting University teaching hospital. Participants Eighty-two adult patients for on-pump coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery. Interventions Patients were randomized. In the ACT group, protamine was titrated until ACT did not exceed baseline by more than 10%. In the TEG group, a TEG-HK R-time difference less than 20% was targeted. Protamine was repeated to achieve the endpoints. Clinicians in the ACT group were blinded to TEG data and vice versa. Measurements and Main Results There was no between-group difference in total protamine dose (3.9±0.6 and 4.2±0.7; 95% CI of the difference between means: -0.544 to 0.008 mg/kg; p = 0.057) or protamine:heparin ratios (1.3:1 and 1.4:1; 95% CI of the difference between means: -0.05 to 0.03 mg/mg; p = 0.653). In the ACT group, 17% of patients required a second protamine dose, and in the TEG group, 24% of patients required a second protamine dose. No between-group differences in the postoperative transfusion requirements or intensive care unit length of stay were demonstrated. Conclusion No difference was identified in protamine dosing using either ACT or TEG-HK R-time difference as endpoints. Heparinase TEG may be useful for monitoring heparin reversal.