...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiac failure >Quality of life assessment for acute heart failure patients from emergency department presentation through 30 days after discharge: A pilot study with the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire
【24h】

Quality of life assessment for acute heart failure patients from emergency department presentation through 30 days after discharge: A pilot study with the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire

机译:从急诊科就诊至出院后30天,对急性心力衰竭患者的生活质量评估:堪萨斯城心肌病问卷调查的初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There are no well validated patient-reported disease status instruments for acute heart failure (HF). We assessed the feasibility of using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) during acute heart failure hospitalization, and the association of acute changes with 30-day readmission. Methods and Results: A convenience sample of acute HF patients were administered the KCCQ on presentation, discharge, and 30 days after discharge. We examined mean differences in KCCQ scores over time, and we stratified by readmission status to examine differences in hospital-based changes with the use of / test and logistic regression. Among 52 patients (mean age 63 ± 15 years, 56.9% male, 46.2% white), discharge and 30-day assessments were each completed by 90%. Scores were lowest at presentation, improved during hospitalization, and were highest at 30 days. The mean change was +11.9 ± 27.0 (P = .007) between presentation and discharge and +19.8 ± 17.8 (P < .001) between discharge and 30 days. Within the 30-day follow-up, 10 patients were readmitted, and there were no significant differences in score changes during hospitalization between patients with and without readmission (readmitted patients: +4.8 ± 21.5 vs no readmission +16.2 ± 27.4; P = .32). Conclusions: In this pilot study, the KCCQ is feasible to use during acute HF hospitalizations and demonstrates sensitivity to acute changes, but score changes during hospitalization did not predict 30-day readmission.
机译:背景:尚无经过充分验证的患者报告的急性心力衰竭(HF)疾病状态仪器。我们评估了在急性心力衰竭住院期间使用堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)的可行性,以及急性变化与30天再入院的相关性。方法和结果:在出院,出院和出院后30天,对急性心衰患者的方便样本进行KCCQ。我们检查了KCCQ评分随时间的平均差异,并根据再入院状态进行分层,以使用/测试和逻辑回归分析基于医院的变更的差异。在52名患者中(平均年龄63±15岁,男性56.9%,白人46.2%),出院和30天评估均完成了90%。呈现时得分最低,住院期间有所改善,30天时得分最高。出院与出院之间的平均变化为+11.9±27.0(P = .007),出院至30天之间的平均变化为+19.8±17.8(P <.001)。在30天的随访期间,有10例患者再次入院,有再入院与未入院的患者在住院期间得分变化无显着差异(已入院患者:+4.8±21.5与无再入院+16.2±27.4; P =。 32)。结论:在该初步研究中,KCCQ在急性心力衰竭住院期间是可行的,并显示出对急性变化的敏感性,但是住院期间的评分变化并不能预测30天的再次入院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号