首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Intraoperative Assessment of the Stability of the Distal Tibiofibular Joint in Supination-External Rotation Injuries of the Ankle: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Reliability of Two Clinical Tests.
【24h】

Intraoperative Assessment of the Stability of the Distal Tibiofibular Joint in Supination-External Rotation Injuries of the Ankle: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Reliability of Two Clinical Tests.

机译:术中评估胫骨腓关节远端在旋转-踝关节外旋转损伤中的稳定性:两种临床试验的敏感性,特异性和可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background:This study was designed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability of the hook test and the stress test for the intraoperative diagnosis of instability of the distal tibiofibular joint following fixation of ankle fractures resulting from supination-external rotation forces.Methods:We conducted a prospective study of 140 patients with an unstable unilateral ankle fracture resulting from a supination-external rotation mechanism (Lauge-Hansen SE). After internal fixation of the malleolar fracture, a hook test and an external rotation stress test under fluoroscopy were performed independently by the lead surgeon and assisting surgeon, followed by a standardized 7.5-Nm external rotation stress test of each ankle under fluoroscopy. A positive stress test result was defined as a side-to-side difference of 2 mm in the tibiotalar or the tibiofibular clear space on mortise radiographs. The sensitivity and specificity of each test were calculated with use of the standardized 7.5-Nm external rotation stress test as a reference.Results:Twenty-four (17%) of the 140 patients had a positive standardized 7.5-Nm external rotation stress test after internal fixation of the malleolar fracture. The hook test had a sensitivity of 0.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.45) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.0) for the detection of the same instabilities. The external rotation stress test had a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.76) and a specificity of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 0.98). Both tests had excellent interobserver reliability, with 99% agreement for the hook test and 98% for the stress test.Conclusions:Interobserver agreement for the hook test and the clinical stress test was excellent, but the sensitivity of these tests was insufficient to adequately detect instability of the syndesmosis intraoperatively.Level of Evidence:Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:本研究旨在评估钩形试验和压力试验的敏感性,特异性和观察者间可靠性,以在术中诊断由旋后-外部旋转力导致的踝部骨折固定后远端胫腓骨远端不稳定性。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,对140例因仰卧外旋转机制(Lauge-Hansen SE)导致的不稳定的单侧踝关节骨折的患者进行了研究。内踝骨折固定后,由主治医师和辅助外科医生分别进行钩挂试验和荧光检查下的外部旋转应力测试,然后在荧光检查下对每个脚踝进行标准化的7.5-Nm外部旋转应力测试。应力测试结果为阳性时,将X线片上的胫距骨或胫腓骨间隙中的侧向差异> 2 mm。以标准化的7.5-Nm外旋压力测试为参考计算每个测试的敏感性和特异性。结果:140例患者中有二十四名(17%)的标准化7.5-Nm外旋压力测试阳性踝骨骨折的内固定。钩试验的灵敏度为0.25(95%置信区间,0.12至0.45),特异性为0.98(95%置信区间,0.94至1.0),用于检测相同的不稳定性。外部旋转应力测试的灵敏度为0.58(95%置信区间为0.39至0.76),特异性为0.96(95%置信区间为0.90至0.98)。两项测试均具有极好的观察者间可靠性,钩子测试的一致性为99%,压力测试的一致性为98%。结论:钩子测试和临床压力测试的观察者间一致性很好,但这些测试的敏感性不足以充分检测证据:诊断水平I。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者须知》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号