首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Analytical Toxicology >Oral fluid is a viable alternative for monitoring drug abuse: detection of drugs in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and comparison to the results from urine samples from patients treated with Methadone or Buprenorphine.
【24h】

Oral fluid is a viable alternative for monitoring drug abuse: detection of drugs in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and comparison to the results from urine samples from patients treated with Methadone or Buprenorphine.

机译:口服液是监测药物滥用的可行替代方案:通过液相色谱-串联质谱法检测口服液中的药物,并与美沙酮或丁丙诺啡治疗患者的尿液样品结果进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Oral fluid is an alternative biological matrix that might have advantages over urine for drug analysis in treatment programs. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method has been used for screening 32 of the most commonly abused drugs and their metabolites in 0.5 mL preserved oral fluid, and the results were compared to results obtained from urine samples taken at the same time. In all, 164 pairs of oral fluid and urine were obtained from 45 patients stabilized on either methadone or buprenorphine. The total number of detections of drugs other than buprenorphine or methadone was 535 in oral fluid and 629 in urine. Morphine was found more often in urine (n = 66) than in oral fluid (n = 48), whereas the opposite was the case for 6-monoacetylmorphine (n = 20 in urine and n = 48 in oral fluid). Methadone showed the same detection frequency in urine and oral fluid (n = 75), whereas amphetamine (n = 45 in urine and n = 51 in oral fluid), methamphetamine (n = 39 in urine and n = 45 in oral fluid), and N-desmethyldiazepam (n = 37 in urine and n = 51 in oral fluid) were detected slightly more often in oral fluid. The other benzodiazepines, cannabis and cocaine were found more frequently in urine samples. If using a sensitive LC-MS-MS technique, oral fluid might be a good alternative to urine for detection of relatively recent use of drugs.
机译:口服液是一种替代的生物基质,在治疗程序中进行药物分析时可能比尿液更具优势。液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS-MS)方法已用于在0.5 mL保存的口服液中筛选32种最常用的药物及其代谢物,并将该结果与从在同时。从45名使用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡稳定的患者中总共获得了164对口服液和尿液。口服液中丁丙诺啡或美沙酮以外的其他药物检出总数为535,尿液中检出总数为629。与尿液(n = 48)相比,尿液中的吗啡含量更高(n = 66),而6-一乙酰基吗啡的尿液中吗啡的含量更高(尿液中n = 20,口腔液中n = 48)。美沙酮在尿液和口腔液中的检出频率相同(n = 75),而苯丙胺(尿液中n = 45,口腔液中n = 51),甲基苯丙胺(尿液中n = 39,口腔液中n = 45),和N-去甲基二氮杂am(尿液中n = 37,口腔液中n = 51)在口腔液中的检出频率更高。在尿液样本中更频繁地发现其他苯并二氮杂卓,大麻和可卡因。如果使用敏感的LC-MS-MS技术,则口服液可能是尿液的良好替代品,可用于检测相对较新的药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号