首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Bipolar permanent magnets for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a pilot study.
【24h】

Bipolar permanent magnets for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a pilot study.

机译:双极型永磁体用于治疗慢性下腰痛的初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Chronic low back pain is one of the most prevalent and costly medical conditions in the United States. Permanent magnets have become a popular treatment for various musculoskeletal conditions, including low back pain, despite little scientific support for therapeutic benefit. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 1 type of therapeutic magnet, a bipolar permanent magnet, with a matching placebo device for patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study conducted from February 1998 to May 1999. SETTING: An ambulatory care physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic at a Veterans Affairs hospital. PATIENTS: Nineteen men and 1 woman with stable low back pain of a mean of 19 years' duration, with no past use of magnet therapy for low back pain. Twenty patients were determined to provide 80% power in the study at P<.05 to detect a difference of 2 points (the difference believed to be clinically significant) on a visual analog scale (VAS). INTERVENTIONS: For each patient, real and sham bipolar permanent magnets were applied, on alternate weeks, for 6 hours per day, 3 days per week for 1 week, with a 1-week washout period between the 2 treatment weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pretreatment and posttreatment pain intensity on a VAS; sensory and affective components of pain on the Pain Rating Index (PRI) of the McGill Pain Questionnaire; and range of motion (ROM) measurements of the lumbosacral spine, compared by real vs sham treatment. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores declined by 0.49 (SD, 0.96) points for real magnet treatment and by 0.44 (SD, 1.4) points for sham treatment (P = .90). No statistically significant differences were noted in the effect between real and sham magnets with any of the other outcome measures (ROM, P = .66; PRI, P = .55). CONCLUSIONS: Application of 1 variety of permanent magnet had no effect on our small group of subjects with chronic low back pain.
机译:语境:慢性下腰痛是美国最普遍和最昂贵的医疗状况之一。永磁体已成为各种肌肉骨骼疾病(包括腰痛)的流行疗法,尽管对治疗益处的科学支持很少。目的:比较一种治疗用磁体(一种双极型永磁体)和一个匹配的安慰剂装置对慢性下腰痛患者的有效性。设计:1998年2月至1999年5月进行的随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,交叉试验研究。地点:退伍军人事务医院的门诊物理医学和康复诊所。患者:19名男性和1名女性患有稳定的下背痛,平均持续19年,过去没有使用磁疗治疗下背痛。研究确定20名患者在P <0.05时提供80%的功效,以视觉模拟量表(VAS)检测2分的差异(该差异被认为是临床上显着的)。干预措施:每位患者隔周分别使用真假双极和假双极永磁体每天6小时,每周3天,共1周,在两个治疗周之间有1周的清除期。主要观察指标:VAS治疗前后的疼痛强度;麦吉尔疼痛问卷的疼痛评分指数(PRI)上的疼痛感官和情感成分;腰real骨脊柱的运动和活动范围(ROM)测量值,通过真实与假手术进行比较。结果:真正的磁疗治疗的VAS平均得分下降了0.49(SD,0.96)分,而假手术治疗的平均VAS得分下降了0.44(SD,1.4)分(P = .90)。使用其他结果指标(ROM,P = 0.66; PRI,P = 0.55)时,实磁铁和假磁铁之间的效果没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:应用1种永磁体对我们这一小组慢性下腰痛患者没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号