首页> 外文期刊>Drugs and aging >Differential impact of NSAIDs on rate of adverse events that require hospitalization in high-risk and general veteran populations: a retrospective cohort study.
【24h】

Differential impact of NSAIDs on rate of adverse events that require hospitalization in high-risk and general veteran populations: a retrospective cohort study.

机译:非甾体抗炎药对高危和一般退伍军人人群中需要住院的不良事件发生率的不同影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Many observational studies in the general population have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse events associated with NSAIDs, including gastrointestinal bleeds, congestive heart failure, acute renal failure, hypertension and acute myocardial infarction. Few studies, however, have explored outcomes in populations considered to be more vulnerable to their effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of adverse events requiring hospitalization that are associated with NSAIDs in two high-risk veteran populations and the general veteran population. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified veterans being dispensed medicines for diabetes mellitus (diabetes cohort), those receiving renin-angiotensin system medicines and frusemide (furosemide) concurrently (ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists [angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs] and frusemide cohort), or at least one other medicine (general population/reference cohort). The primary endpoint was hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure, gastrointestinal ulcer, acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction or hypertension. Hospitalization rates during the period of non-exposure and the 30-day period after a subject was first dispensed an NSAID were compared using Poisson regression. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in risk of all hospitalizations of interest in the exposed period compared with the unexposed period in the diabetes cohort (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.31; 95% CI 1.08, 1.60), ACE inhibitor/ARB and frusemide cohort (IRR 1.34; 95% CI 1.13, 1.58) and reference cohort (IRR 1.47; 95% CI 1.30, 1.66). The incidence rates demonstrate that for every 10,000 veterans treated for 30 days with NSAIDs, there were 20 extra hospitalizations in the diabetes population, 30 additional hospitalizations in the ACE inhibitor/ARB and frusemide cohort and 6 extra hospitalizations in the reference population compared with those not treated with NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID use is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization in all groups, with similar risk ratio estimates. However, the clinical implications were greater in the high-risk populations, in which more hospitalizations were observed. Consideration may need to be given to differential presentation of risk information to clinicians.
机译:背景:在普通人群中,许多观察性研究表明,与非甾体抗炎药相关的不良事件风险增加,包括胃肠道出血,充血性心力衰竭,急性肾衰竭,高血压和急性心肌梗塞。然而,很少有研究探索认为更易受其影响的人群的治疗效果。目的:确定在两个高危退伍军人人群和普通退伍军人人群中需要住院的与NSAID相关的不良事件发生率。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了退伍军人正在分配用于糖尿病的药物(糖尿病人群),同时接受肾素-血管紧张素系统药物和氟舒米特(呋塞米)的药物(ACE抑制剂/血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂[血管紧张素受体阻滞剂; [ARBs]和frusemide队列),或至少一种其他药物(一般人群/参考队列)。主要终点是住院,初步诊断为充血性心力衰竭,胃肠道溃疡,急性肾功能衰竭,急性心肌梗塞或高血压。使用Poisson回归比较未接触期间和首次分配NSAID后30天期间的住院率。结果:与未暴露期相比,在糖尿病人群中,所有相关住院的风险显着增加(发生率[IRR] 1.31; 95%CI 1.08,1.60),ACEI / ARB和氟赛米特队列(IRR 1.34; 95%CI 1.13,1.58)和参考队列(IRR 1.47; 95%CI 1.30,1.66)。发病率表明,使用NSAID进行30天治疗的每10,000名退伍军人,糖尿病人群中有20例额外住院,而ACE抑制剂/ ARB和frusemide队列中有30例额外住院,参考人群中有6例额外住院。用NSAID治疗。结论:NSAID的使用与所有组的住院风险增加相关,风险比率估算值相似。然而,在高危人群中,其临床意义更大,其中观察到更多的住院治疗。可能需要考虑将风险信息差异化呈现给临床医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号