...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Association between nonnaproxen NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors and hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction among the elderly: a retrospective cohort study.
【24h】

Association between nonnaproxen NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors and hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction among the elderly: a retrospective cohort study.

机译:老年患者急性萘普生中非萘普生NSAIDs,COX-2抑制剂与住院之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between rofecoxib, celecoxib, diclofenac, and ibuprofen and the risk of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in an elderly population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using data from the government of Quebec health insurance agency databases, among patients 65-80 years of age who filled a prescription for any of the study drugs during 1999-2002. Cox regression models with time-dependent exposure were used to compare the incidence rates of hospitalization for AMI adjusting for patients' baseline characteristics. Analyses stratified by dose and number of supplied days were also conducted. RESULTS: At the index date, a total of 91 062 patients were taking rofecoxib, 127 928 celecoxib, 49 193 diclofenac, and 15 601 ibuprofen. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95%CI) of hospitalization for AMI were: celecoxib versus rofecoxib: 0.90 (0.79, 1.01); ibuprofen versus rofecoxib: 0.95 (0.65, 1.37); diclofenac versus rofecoxib: 1.01 (0.84, 1.22). In secondary analyses based on intended duration of use, neither COX-2 selective inhibitor was associated with a higher risk than ibuprofen or diclofenac. The unadjusted risk of AMI for all NSAIDs increased with dose. In the direct two way adjusted comparison of each NSAID stratified by dose, the only statistically significant difference was with rofecoxib >25 mg/day versus celecoxib >200 mg/day. CONCLUSION: In this study there was no difference between AMI occurrence in elderly patients taking rofecoxib or celecoxib at recommended doses for chronic indications versus those taking ibuprofen/diclofenac. However, the risk of AMI was higher among patients using higher doses of rofecoxib (>25 mg/day) compared to patients using higher doses of celecoxib (>200 mg/day).
机译:目的:评估罗非考昔,塞来昔布,双氯芬酸和布洛芬之间的关系,以及老年人中急性心肌梗死(AMI)的住院风险。方法:我们使用魁北克健康保险局数据库的数据,对65-80岁的患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者在1999-2002年期间为任何研究药物填写了处方。使用具有时间依赖性暴露的Cox回归模型比较AMI的住院率,并根据患者的基线特征进行调整。还进行了按剂量和供应天数分层的分析。结果:在索引日期,总共有91 062例患者服用罗非考昔,127 928塞来昔布,49 193双氯芬酸和15 601布洛芬。 AMI住院调整后的危险比(HR)(95%CI)为:塞来昔布与罗非昔布:0.90(0.79,1.01);布洛芬与罗非昔布:0.95(0.65,1.37);双氯芬酸与罗非昔布:1.01(0.84,1.22)。在根据预期的使用期限进行的二级分析中,没有两种COX-2选择性抑制剂比布洛芬或双氯芬酸具有更高的风险。所有NSAID的未调整AMI风险均随剂量增加。在按剂量分层的每种NSAID的直接双向调整比较中,唯一的统计学上显着差异是罗非昔布> 25 mg /天与塞来昔布> 200 mg /天。结论:在这项研究中,以慢性适应症推荐剂量服用罗非考昔或塞来昔布的老年患者与服用布洛芬/双氯芬酸的老年患者的AMI发生没有差异。但是,与使用较高剂量塞洛昔布(> 200 mg /天)的患者相比,使用较高剂量罗非昔布(> 25 mg /天)的患者发生AMI的风险更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号