首页> 外文期刊>Die Pharmazie >Peppermint oil-caraway oil fixed combination in non-ulcer dyspepsia--comparison of the effects of enteric preparations
【24h】

Peppermint oil-caraway oil fixed combination in non-ulcer dyspepsia--comparison of the effects of enteric preparations

机译:非溃疡性消化不良的薄荷油-香菜油固定组合-肠溶制剂作用的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

223 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (dysmotility type dyspepsia or essential/idiopathic dyspepsia, also in combination with irritable bowel syndrome) were included in a prospective, randomised, reference- and double-blind controlled multicentre trial to compare two different preparations of a fixed combination of peppermint oil and caraway oil. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the equivalence of the efficacy and tolerability of these two preparations. The test formulation consisted of the drug combination in an enteric coated capsule containing 90 mg peppermint oil and 50 mg caraway oil, while an enteric soluble formulation containing 36 mg peppermint oil and 20 mg caraway oil was used as the reference. The main target item defined was the "difference in pain intensity between the beginning and the end of therapy", measured by the patient on a visual analogue scale (0 = no pain, 10 = extremely strong pain). In 213 patients (n = 108 on the test preparation, n = 105 on the reference preparation) with mean pain intensity baseline measurements of 6.1 points in the test preparation group and 5.9 points in the reference group a statistically significant decline in pain intensity was observed in the two groups (-3.6 resP. -3.3 points; p < 0.001; two-sided one-sample t-test). Equivalent efficacy of both preparations was demonstrated (p < 0.001; one-sided t-test for equivalence). With respect to concomitant variables, the results in both groups were also similar. Regarding "pain frequency", the efficacy of the test preparation was significantly better (p = 0.04; two-sided t-test for difference). Both preparations were well tolerated. Despite the higher dose, the adverse event "eructation with peppermint taste" was less frequent in the group treated with the test formulation, due to the enteric coated capsule preparation.
机译:在一项前瞻性,随机,参考和双盲对照的多中心试验中纳入了223例非溃疡性消化不良(运动障碍型消化不良或原发性/特发性消化不良,还伴肠易激综合征)的患者,以比较两种不同的固定制剂薄荷油和香菜油的混合物。该试验的目的是评估这两种制剂的疗效和耐受性的等效性。测试制剂由包含90 mg薄荷油和50 mg香菜油的肠溶衣胶囊中的药物组合组成,而包含36 mg薄荷油和20 mg香菜油的肠溶性制剂用作参考。定义的主要目标项目是“治疗开始和结束之间的疼痛强度差异”,由患者以视觉模拟量表进行测量(0 =无疼痛,10 =强烈疼痛)。在213名患者中(测试制剂中n = 108,参考制剂中n = 105),平均疼痛强度基线测量值在测试制剂组中为6.1点,在参考组中为5.9点,观察到疼痛强度在统计学上显着下降在两组中(-3.6 resP。-3.3分; p <0.001;双面一样本t检验)。两种制剂均具有等效功效(p <0.001;等效性的单侧t检验)。关于伴随变量,两组的结果也相似。关于“疼痛频率”,测试制剂的功效明显更好(p = 0.04;差异的双面t检验)。两种制剂均耐受良好。尽管剂量较高,但由于肠溶衣胶囊制剂,在用测试制剂治疗的组中,不良事件“薄荷味发炎”的发生率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号