首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >Evaluation of sequential testing strategies using non-amplified and amplified methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women.
【24h】

Evaluation of sequential testing strategies using non-amplified and amplified methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women.

机译:评价使用非扩增和扩增方法检测妇女宫颈和尿液标本中沙眼衣原体的顺序检测策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are more sensitive than other methods for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) genital infections. Two unique sequential testing strategies that employed two different commercial NAAT methods to detect CT in a population of women with widely varying infection risk were evaluated. Specimens from 504 women aged 15 to 75 years were studied. Two endocervical swabs and a urine sample were collected from each woman. One swab was initially tested using the Access enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Beckman). An aliquot from the EIA extraction was subsequently amplified using the COBAS AMPLICOR CT assay (PCR) (Roche). The second swab was initially tested using the PACE 2 CT hybridization assay (Gen-Probe). An aliquot was pipetted off prior to performing the PACE 2 assay and also amplified using the AMP-CT assay (TMA) (Gen-Probe). Urine samples were tested for CT using both NAAT methods. True CT infections were defined as any woman that was confirmed to be positive on both NAAT results from endocervical swabs. The results of all other CT assays were compared against this expanded gold standard. 28 women were confirmed to have CT infection giving an overall prevalence of 5.6%; low-risk women had a rate of 1.3% while high-risk women had a rate of 9.8%. NAAT methods have a higher sensitivity for detecting CT cervicitis when swabs are tested compared to urine. The positive predictive value of NAAT is decreased when testing low risk women. Limited automation makes it difficult to test a high volume of samples (i.e., > 100 swabs and/or urines) using either of these NAAT methods and continue to provide same day results. Laboratories performing CT testing must define the female population served so that appropriate diagnostic strategies can be employed.
机译:核酸扩增检测(NAAT)比其他方法更能诊断沙眼衣原体(CT)生殖器感染。评估了两种独特的顺序测试策略,这些策略采用两种不同的商业NAAT方法来检测感染风险差异很大的女性人群中的CT。研究对象为504位年龄在15至75岁之间的女性。从每个妇女那里收集了两个宫颈拭子和尿液样本。最初使用Access酶免疫分析(EIA)(Beckman)测试了一根拭子。随后使用COBAS AMPLICOR CT分析(PCR)(Roche)扩增EIA提取物中的等分试样。最初使用PACE 2 CT杂交测定法(Gen-Probe)测试了第二个拭子。在进行PACE 2测定之前,将等分试样移出,并且还使用AMP-CT测定(TMA)(Gen-Probe)进行扩增。使用两种NAAT方法测试尿液样本的CT。真正的CT感染被定义为在宫颈拭子的两种NAAT结果中均被证实为阳性的任何女性。将所有其他CT分析的结果与此扩展的金标准进行了比较。确认有28名妇女患有CT感染,总体患病率为5.6%;低风险妇女的比率为1.3%,高风险妇女的比率为9.8%。与棉签相比,NAAT方法在检测棉签时检测CT宫颈炎的敏感性更高。当测试低风险女性时,NAAT的阳性预测值会降低。自动化程度有限,因此很难使用这两种NAAT方法中的任一种来测试大量样品(即> 100个拭子和/或尿液),并继续提供当天的结果。进行CT测试的实验室必须确定所服务的女性人群,以便可以采用适当的诊断策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号