...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Detection of Abnormal Glucose Tolerance in Africans Is Improved by Combining A1C With Fasting Glucose: The Africans in America Study
【24h】

Detection of Abnormal Glucose Tolerance in Africans Is Improved by Combining A1C With Fasting Glucose: The Africans in America Study

机译:通过将A1C与禁食葡萄糖结合起来,可改善非洲人异常葡萄糖耐受性的检测:《美国非洲人研究》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVEAbnormal glucose tolerance is rising in sub-Saharan Africa. Hemoglobin A(1c) by itself and in combination with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is used to diagnose abnormal glucose tolerance. The diagnostic ability of A1C in Africans with heterozygous variant hemoglobin, such as sickle cell trait or hemoglobin C trait, has not been rigorously evaluated. In U.S.-based Africans, we determined by hemoglobin status the sensitivities of 1) FPG 5.6 mmol/L, 2) A1C 5.7% (39 mmol/mol), and 3) FPG combined with A1C (FPG 5.6 mmol/L and/or A1C 5.7% [39 mmol/mol]) for the detection of abnormal glucose tolerance.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSAn oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in 216 African immigrants (68% male, age 37 10 years [mean SD], range 20-64 years). Abnormal glucose tolerance was defined as 2-h glucose 7.8 mmol/L.RESULTSVariant hemoglobin was identified in 21% (46 of 216). Abnormal glucose tolerance occurred in 33% (72 of 216). When determining abnormal glucose tolerance from the OGTT (2-h glucose 7.8 mmol/L), sensitivities of FPG for the total, normal, and variant hemoglobin groups were 32%, 32%, and 33%, respectively. Sensitivities for A1C were 53%, 54%, and 47%. For FPG and A1C combined, sensitivities were 64%, 63%, and 67%. Sensitivities for FPG and A1C and the combination did not vary by hemoglobin status (all P > 0.6). For the entire cohort, sensitivity was higher for A1C than FPG and for both tests combined than for either test alone (all P values 0.01).CONCLUSIONSNo significant difference in sensitivity of A1C by variant hemoglobin status was detected. For the diagnosis of abnormal glucose tolerance in Africans, the sensitivity of A1C combined with FPG is significantly superior to either test alone.
机译:目的非洲撒哈拉以南地区的葡萄糖耐量异常增加。血红蛋白A(1c)本身以及与空腹血糖(FPG)结合用于诊断异常的葡萄糖耐量。尚未严格评估具有杂合变异血红蛋白(例如镰状细胞性状或血红蛋白C性状)的非洲人中A1C的诊断能力。在美国的非洲人中,我们通过血红蛋白状态确定了以下因素的敏感性:1)FPG 5.6 mmol / L,2)A1C 5.7%(39 mmol / mol)和3)FPG与A1C(FPG 5.6 mmol / L和/或A1C 5.7%[39 mmol / mol]),用于检测异常的糖耐量。研究设计和方法对216名非洲移民(68%的男性,年龄37岁10岁,平均SD)进行了口服糖耐量测试(OGTT)。 20-64岁)。异常的葡萄糖耐量定义为2小时葡萄糖7.8 mmol / L。结果在21%(216中的46)中鉴定出变态血红蛋白。葡萄糖耐量异常的发生率为33%(216中的72)。从OGTT(2-h葡萄糖7.8 mmol / L)确定异常葡萄糖耐量时,FPG对总,正常和变异血红蛋白组的敏感性分别为32%,32%和33%。 A1C的敏感性分别为53%,54%和47%。对于FPG和A1C组合,敏感性分别为64%,63%和67%。对FPG和A1C及其组合的敏感性并未因血红蛋白状态而变化(所有P> 0.6)。在整个队列中,A1C的敏感性均高于FPG,两项测试的总和均高于单独一项测试(所有P值均为0.01)。结论结论:未检测到因变异血红蛋白状态而导致的A1C敏感性的显着差异。对于非洲人异常的葡萄糖耐量的诊断,A1C联合FPG的敏感性明显优于单独的两种检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号