首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes: influences of glycaemic control, obesity and social disadvantage.
【24h】

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes: influences of glycaemic control, obesity and social disadvantage.

机译:妊娠合并1型和2型糖尿病的产科和围产期结局:血糖控制,肥胖症和社会不利因素的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To compare obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and relate these to maternal risk factors. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 682 consecutive diabetic pregnancies in East Anglia during 2006-2009. Relationships between congenital malformation, perinatal mortality and perinatal morbidity (large for gestational age, preterm delivery, neonatal care) with maternal age, parity, ethnicity, glycaemic control, obesity and social disadvantage were examined using bivariable and multivariate models. RESULTS: There were 408 (59.8%) Type 1 and 274 (40.2%) Type 2 diabetes pregnancies. Women with Type 2 diabetes were older (P < 0.001), heavier (P < 0.0001), more frequently multiparous (P < 0.001), more ethnically diverse (p < 0.0001) and more socially disadvantaged (P = 0.0004). Although women with Type 2 diabetes had shorter duration of diabetes (P < 0.0001) and better pre-conception glycaemic control [HbA(1c) 52 mmol/mol (6.9%) Type 2 diabetes vs. 63 mmol/l (7.9%) Type 1 diabetes; p < 0.0001), rates of congenital malformation and perinatal mortality were comparable. Women with Type 2 diabetes had fewer large-for-gestational-age infants (37.6 vs. 52.9%, P < 0.0008), fewer preterm deliveries (17.5 vs. 37.1%, P < 0.0001) and their offspring had fewer neonatal care admissions (29.8 vs. 43.2%, P = 0.001). Third trimester HbA(1c) (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.67, P = 0.006) and social disadvantage (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.98; P = 0.03) were risk factors for large for gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased age, parity, obesity and social disadvantage, women with Type 2 diabetes had better glycaemic control, fewer large-for-gestational-age infants, fewer preterm deliveries and fewer neonatal care admissions. Better tools are needed to improve glycaemic control and reduce the rates of large for gestational age, particularly in Type 1 diabetes.
机译:目的:比较1型和2型糖尿病女性的产科和围产期结局,并将其与孕产妇危险因素联系起来。方法:前瞻性队列研究在2006-2009年间在东安格利亚进行的682例糖尿病患者的连续妊娠。使用双变量和多变量模型研究了先天性畸形,围产期死亡率和围产期发病率(胎龄,早产,新生儿护理较大)与产妇年龄,胎次,种族,血糖控制,肥胖症和社会劣势之间的关系。结果:1型糖尿病有408(59.8%),2型糖尿病有274(40.2%)。患有2型糖尿病的女性年龄较大(P <0.001),较重(P <0.0001),多胎(P <0.001),种族差异(p <0.0001)和社会处境不利(P = 0.0004)。尽管患有2型糖尿病的妇女的糖尿病病程较短(P <0.0001),并且受孕前的血糖控制较好[HbA(1c)52 mmol / mol(6.9%)2型糖尿病,而63 mmol / l(7.9%)2型糖尿病1糖尿病; p <0.0001),先天性畸形和围产期死亡率相当。 2型糖尿病妇女的大胎龄婴儿较少(37.6 vs. 52.9%,P <0.0008),早产较少(17.5 vs. 37.1%,P <0.0001),其后代的新生儿护理较少( 29.8比43.2%,P = 0.001)。孕晚期HbA(1c)(OR 1.35,95%CI 1.09-1.67,P = 0.006)和社会不利因素(OR 0.80,95%CI 0.67-0.98; P = 0.03)是大胎龄的危险因素。结论:尽管年龄,均等,肥胖和社会不利因素增加,但2型糖尿病女性的血糖控制效果更好,大胎龄婴儿较少,早产和新生儿护理人数较少。需要更好的工具来改善血糖控制并降低胎龄大的人,尤其是在1型糖尿病中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号