首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Contemporary rates of severe hypoglycaemia in youth with Type1 diabetes: Variability by insulin regimen
【24h】

Contemporary rates of severe hypoglycaemia in youth with Type1 diabetes: Variability by insulin regimen

机译:当代1型糖尿病青年严重低血糖的发生率:胰岛素治疗方案的变异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims To determine incidence rates of severe hypoglycaemia and compare incidence rates by insulin regimen in a diverse sample of youth with Type1 diabetes from two sites. Methods In this observational study, 255 youth (51% female) aged 9-15years receiving varied insulin regimens provided data prospectively for a median of 1.2years. Reported episodes of severe hypoglycaemia, defined as episodes requiring help from another person for oral treatment or episodes resulting in seizure/coma, and current insulin regimens were collected systematically. Incidence rates were calculated and compared according to insulin regimen in bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results At first encounter, participants had a median age of 12.2years (range 9.0-15.0), median diabetes duration of 4.4years (range 1.0-13.0) and mean HbA 1c of 67±12mmol/mol (8.3±1.1%). The incidence rate was 37.6/100patient-years for all severe hypoglycaemia and 9.6/100patient-years for seizure/coma. The incidence rate for severe hypoglycaemia was 31.8/100patient-years on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (pump therapy), 34.4/100patient-years on basal-bolus injections and 46.1/100patient-years on NPH (NPH vs. pump therapy: P=0.04). The incidence rate for seizure/coma was 4.5/100patient-years on pump therapy, 11.1/100patient-years on basal-bolus injections and 14.4/100 patients-years on NPH (NPH vs. pump therapy: P=0.004). In the multivariate analysis, the rate of seizure/coma was significantly higher for those on NPH vs. pump therapy (rate ratio 2.9, P=0.03). Conclusions Rates of severe hypoglycaemia in youth with Type1 diabetes remain high. Pump therapy was associated with lower rates of all severe hypoglycaemia and seizure/coma in comparison with NPH.
机译:目的在两个地点的1型糖尿病青年中,确定严重低血糖的发生率并通过胰岛素方案比较发生率。方法在这项观察性研究中,接受不同胰岛素治疗的255名9-15岁的青年(51%女性)前瞻性提供了数据,中位数为1.2年。报道的严重低血糖发作,定义为需要他人口服治疗的发作或导致癫痫/昏迷的发作,并且系统地收集了当前的胰岛素治疗方案。在双变量和多变量分析中,根据胰岛素治疗方案计算并比较了发病率。结果初次见面时,参与者的中位年龄为12.2岁(范围9.0-15.0),中位糖尿病病程为4.4年(范围1.0-13.0),平均HbA 1c为67±12mmol / mol(8.3±1.1%)。所有严重低血糖的发生率为37.6 / 100患者年,癫痫/昏迷的发生率为9.6 / 100患者年。连续皮下胰岛素输注(泵疗法)的严重低血糖发生率是31.8 / 100患者年,基础推注注射时是34.4 / 100患者年,NPH是46.1 / 100患者年(NPH vs.泵疗法:P = 0.04) )。泵治疗的癫痫发作/昏迷发生率为4.5 / 100患者-年,基础推注注射的癫痫发作/昏迷发生率为11.1 / 100患者-年,NPH的发生率为14.4 / 100患者-年(NPH vs.泵治疗:P = 0.004)。在多变量分析中,NPH组和抽搐治疗组的癫痫/昏迷发生率显着更高(比率2.9,P = 0.03)。结论青少年1型糖尿病的严重低血糖发生率仍然很高。与NPH相比,泵浦疗法与所有严重低血糖和癫痫/昏迷发生率较低相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号