首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet
【24h】

A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet

机译:后现代的潘多拉魔盒:互联网上的防疫苗错误信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Internet plays a large role in disseminating anti-vaccination information. This paper builds upon previous research by analyzing the arguments proffered on anti-vaccination websites, determining the extent of misinformation present, and examining discourses used to support vaccine objections. Arguments around the themes of safety and effectiveness, alternative medicine, civil liberties, conspiracy theories, and morality were found on the majority of websites analyzed; misinformation was also prevalent. The most commonly proposed method of combating this misinformation is through better education, although this has proven ineffective. Education does not consider the discourses supporting vaccine rejection, such as those involving alternative explanatory models of health, interpretations of parental responsibility, and distrust of expertise. Anti-vaccination Protestors make postmodern arguments that reject biomedical and scientific "facts" in favour of their own interpretations. Pro-vaccination advocates who focus on correcting misinformation reduce the controversy to merely an "educational" problem: rather, these postmodern discourses must be acknowledged in order to begin a dialogue.
机译:互联网在传播抗疫苗信息方面发挥着重要作用。本文通过分析抗疫苗网站上的论点,确定错误信息的程度以及检查用于支持疫苗异议的论述,在以前的研究的基础上进行研究。在分析的大多数网站上,都围绕安全性和有效性,替代医学,公民自由,阴谋论和道德等主题进行了争论。错误信息也很普遍。解决这种错误信息的最常用方法是通过更好的教育,尽管事实证明这种方法无效。教育不考虑支持疫苗拒绝的话语,例如涉及替代性的健康解释模式,对父母责任的解释以及对专业知识的不信任的话语。反疫苗接种抗议者提出后现代论据,反对生物医学和科学“事实”,以支持他们自己的解释。致力于纠正错误信息的预防接种倡导者们将争论仅归因于“教育”问题:相反,必须承认这些后现代话语才能开始对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号