首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Comparing Conventional, Hybrid, and Distance Learning Courses in Horticulture
【24h】

Comparing Conventional, Hybrid, and Distance Learning Courses in Horticulture

机译:比较园艺的常规,混合和远程学习课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a conventional sophomore level course entitled "Organic Farming and Gardening,'' 114 undergraduate students registered fromyears 2007 to 2009. Due to high demand and insufficient classroom space, this conventional curriculum was reformatted with identical course content into both a hybrid and a fully online version in which 361 students registered from years 2010 to 2012 and 336 students from 2013 to 2015. In comparing conventional instruction with hybrid and fully online versions over a 9-year period, few significant differences were found in final grades involving 811 students. Final class grade averages of these three learning systems ranged from 85.5% to 89.6% over their first 3-year spans. Over their 6-year span, the conventional class average of 89.6% was higher compared with 88.3% for the hybrid format and 86.8% for the online format. Student evaluation surveys assessed faculty performance with eight evaluative questions on a 1 to 5 scale from years 2012 to 2014. No significant difference existed between teaching in person vs. remotely, averaging 4.35 for the hybrid and 4.17 for the online. An additional eight questions measured educational methodology, technology, student confidence, and class satisfaction. There were no significant differences in comparing the combined averages of 4.12 for the hybrid format and 4.00 for the online version. Student responses indicated a significant preference overall for hybrid and online course formats compared with conventional methods. Registration numbers indicated an overwhelming choice for online education with an average class enrollment of 91.0 students compared with 38.0 students for conventional classes and 25.2 students for the hybrid format.
机译:在2007年至2009年间,一门名为“有机农业与园艺”的常规大二课程中,有114名本科生注册。由于需求量大和教室空间不足,该常规课程被重新设置为具有相同课程内容的混合课程和完全在线课程在2010年至2012年期间,共有361名学生注册,2013年至2013年,共有336名学生注册。在比较传统教学与混合和完全在线版本的9年期间,涉及811名学生的最终成绩差异不大。这三个学习系统的前三年平均成绩在85.5%至89.6%之间,而在过去六年中,常规班平均成绩为89.6%,高于混合课程的平均水平88.3%和普通课程的86.8%。从2012年到2014年,学生评估调查以1到5的比例对8个评估问题进行了教师绩效评估。面对面教学与远程教学之间没有任何区别,混合教学平均为4.35,在线教学平均为4.17。另外八个问题衡量了教学方法,技术,学生信心和班级满意度。比较混合格式的4.12和在线版本的4.00的组合平均值没有显着差异。学生的回答表明,与传统方法相比,总体上对混合和在线课程格式的偏好更高。注册人数表明在线教育是一个压倒性的选择,平均每班学生人数为91.0名学生,而传统班级为38.0名学生,混合班级为25.2名学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号