...
首页> 外文期刊>Histopathology: Official Journal of the British Division of the International Academy of Pathology >Cell proliferation marker MCM2, but not Ki67, is helpful for distinguishing between minimally invasive follicular carcinoma and follicular adenoma of the thyroid.
【24h】

Cell proliferation marker MCM2, but not Ki67, is helpful for distinguishing between minimally invasive follicular carcinoma and follicular adenoma of the thyroid.

机译:细胞增殖标记物MCM2,而不是Ki67,有助于区分微创性滤泡性癌和甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cell proliferation marker MCM2, but not Ki67, is helpful for distinguishing between minimally invasive follicular carcinoma and follicular adenoma of the thyroidAims : To compare cell proliferation markers, minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM2) and Ki67, in minimally invasive follicular carcinoma (MIFC) and follicular adenoma (FA) of the thyroid and among MIFCs with different diagnostic criteria. Methods and results : Twenty-two MIFCs and 20 FAs were immunohistochemically stained for MCM2 and Ki67. The MIFCs were subdivided into six Group 1 tumours with both capsular and vascular invasions, seven Group 2 tumours with vascular invasion only and nine Group 3 tumours with capsular invasion only. The MCM2 and Ki67 indices were calculated, counting more than 1000 tumour cells in the most frequently positive areas. In total and Groups 1-3 MIFCs and in FAs, the average MCM2 index was 26.7 +/- 11.0, 28.4 +/- 8.6, 26.3 +/- 14.8, 25.9 +/- 8.4 and 10.7 +/- 4.5, respectively, whereas the average Ki67 index was 2.07 +/- 1.65, 1.93 +/- 2.02, 2.49 +/-1.38, 1.84 +/- 1.5 and 1.78 +/- 0.92, respectively. There was a significant difference in the MCM2 index, but not in the Ki67 index, between each category of MIFCs and FA (P < 0.01). However, neither the MCM2 index nor the Ki67 index showed a statistically significant difference among the subgroups of MIFC. Conclusions : MCM2, but not Ki67, is a helpful marker for differentiating MIFC from FA. The tumour cell proliferative activity supports the histological criteria based on diagnosing MIFC by either capsular or vascular invasion only.
机译:细胞增殖标志物MCM2(而非Ki67)有助于区分微创性滤泡性癌和甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤(FA)和诊断标准不同的MIFC中。方法和结果:对22个MIFC和20个FA进行了免疫组织化学染色,检测了MCM2和Ki67。 MIFCs被细分为六种同时具有包膜和血管浸润的第一组肿瘤,七种仅具有血管浸润的第二组肿瘤和九种仅具有荚膜浸润的第3组肿瘤。计算了MCM2和Ki67指数,计数了最常见阳性区域中的1000多个肿瘤细胞。在总计1-3组的MIFC和FA中,平均MCM2指数分别为26.7 +/- 11.0、28.4 +/- 8.6、26.3 +/- 14.8、25.9 +/- 8.4和10.7 +/- 4.5,而平均Ki67指数分别为2.07 +/- 1.65、1.93 +/- 2.02、2.49 +/- 1.38、1.84 +/- 1.5和1.78 +/- 0.92。 MIFC和FA的每个类别之间MCM2指数存在显着差异,而Ki67指数则无显着差异(P <0.01)。但是,在MIFC的亚组之间,MCM2指数和Ki67指数均未显示出统计学上的显着差异。结论:MCM2,而不是Ki67,是区分MIFC和FA的有用标志物。肿瘤细胞的增生活性支持基于仅通过包膜或血管浸润诊断MIFC的组织学标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号