首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Choice in the context of informal care-giving.
【24h】

Choice in the context of informal care-giving.

机译:在非正式照料中进行选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Extending choice and control for social care service users is a central feature of current English policies. However, these have comparatively little to say about choice in relation to the informal carers of relatives, friends or older people who are disabled or sick. To explore the realities of choice as experienced by carers, the present paper reviews research published in English since 1985 about three situations in which carers are likely to face choices: receiving social services; the entry of an older person to long-term care; and combining paid work and care. Thirteen electronic databases were searched, covering both the health and social care fields. Databases included: ASSIA; IBSS; Social Care Online; ISI Web of Knowledge; Medline; HMIC; Sociological Abstracts; INGENTA; ZETOC; and the National Research Register. The search strategy combined terms that: (1) identified individuals with care-giving responsibilities; (2) identified people receiving help and support; and (3) described the process of interest (e.g. choice, decision-making and self-determination). The search identified comparatively few relevant studies, and so was supplemented by the findings from another recent review of empirical research on carers' choices about combining work and care. The research evidence suggests that carers' choices are shaped by two sets of factors: one relates to the nature of the care-giving relationship; and the second consists of wider organisational factors. A number of reasons may explain the invisibility of choice for carers in current policy proposals for increasing choice. In particular, it is suggested that underpinning conceptual models of the relationship between carers and formal service providers shape the extent to which carers can be offered choice and control on similar terms to service users. In particular, the exercise of choice by carers is likely to be highly problematic if it involves relinquishing some unpaid care-giving activities.
机译:扩展对社会护理服务用户的选择和控制是当前英语政策的主要特征。但是,对于残疾或患病的亲戚,朋友或年长者的非正式照料者,这些选择几乎没有什么可说的。为了探究护理人员所经历的选择现实,本文回顾了自1985年以来以英语发表的关于护理人员可能面临选择的三种情况的研究:获得社会服务;老年人进入长期护理;并将带薪工作和照料相结合。搜索了13个电子数据库,涵盖了健康和社会护理领域。数据库包括:ASSIA; IBSS;在线社会关怀; ISI知识网; Medline; HMIC;社会学文摘; INGENTA; ZETOC;和国家研究注册。该搜索策略结合了以下术语:(1)确定具有看护责任的个人; (2)确定得到帮助和支持的人; (3)描述了感兴趣的过程(例如选择,决策和自决)。该搜索确定了相对较少的相关研究,因此,最近对另一项关于护理人员选择工作和护理相结合的经验研究的实证研究结果也对此进行了补充。研究证据表明,看护者的选择受两套因素影响:一类与护理关系的性质有关;二类与护理关系有关。第二个因素包括更广泛的组织因素。在当前增加选择的政策建议中,有许多原因可以解释看护者选择的隐性。尤其是,有人建议,照料者与正式服务提供者之间关系的概念模型的基础决定了照料者可以在类似的条件下向服务使用者提供选择和控制的程度。特别是,如果护理人员选择放弃一些无偿的照料活动,则选择问题很可能会成问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号