首页> 外文期刊>Health care management review >Community benefits provided by religious, other nonprofit, and for-profit hospitals: A longitudinal analysis 2000-2009
【24h】

Community benefits provided by religious, other nonprofit, and for-profit hospitals: A longitudinal analysis 2000-2009

机译:宗教医院,其他非营利性和营利性医院提供的社区利益:2000-2009年的纵向分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Nonprofit hospitals (NFPs) are expected to provide community benefits to justify the tax benefits they receive, but recent budgetary constraints have called into question the degree to which the tax benefits are justified. The empirical literature comparing community benefits provided by NFPs and their for-profit counterparts is mixed. However, NFPs are not a homogenous group and can include religious hospitals, community-owned hospitals, or academic medical centers. PURPOSE:: This longitudinal study examines how religious hospitals compare with other NFPs and for-profit hospitals with respect to providing community benefits and how the provision of community benefits by hospitals has changed over time. METHODOLOGY:: Using a pooled cross-sectional design, we examine two summated scores based on questions from the American Hospital Association annual survey that focus on community orientation among hospitals. We analyze two regressions with year, facility, and market controls to determine how religious hospitals compare with the other groups over time. FINDINGS:: Overall, 11% of U.S. hospitals are religious. Religious hospitals were more likely to engage in each individual community benefit activity examined. In addition, the mean values of community benefits provided by religious hospitals, as measured on two summated scores, were significantly higher than those provided by other hospital types in bivariate and regression analyses. Overall, community benefits provided by all hospitals increased over time and then leveled off during the start of the recent economic downturn. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:: As the debate continues regarding federal tax exemption status, policymakers should consider religious hospitals separately from NFPs. Managers at religious hospitals should consider how their increased levels of community benefits are related to their missions and set benchmarks that recognize and communicate those achievements.
机译:背景:非营利性医院(NFP)有望提供社区福利,以证明其所获得的税收优惠是合理的,但是最近的预算限制使人们对税收优惠的合理性提出质疑。比较NFP和其营利性机构提供的社区收益的实证文献是混杂的。但是,NFP并非同质团体,可以包括宗教医院,社区拥有的医院或学术医疗中心。目的::这项纵向研究探讨了宗教医院在提供社区福利方面与其他NFP和营利性医院的比较,以及随着时间推移医院提供的社区福利的变化。方法::使用汇总的横断面设计,我们根据美国医院协会年度调查的问题,检查了两个总分,这些问题侧重于医院之间的社区定位。我们分析了年度,设施和市场控制的两个回归,以确定随着时间的推移宗教医院与其他医院的比较。调查结果::总体而言,美国11%的医院是宗教医院。宗教医院更有可能参与所检查的每个社区福利活动。此外,在两因素和回归分析中,宗教医院提供的社区福利的平均值(以两个总和得分来衡量)显着高于其他医院类型提供的平均值。总体而言,所有医院提供的社区福利随着时间的流逝而增加,然后在最近的经济衰退开始时趋于平稳。实践的意义:随着关于联邦免税地位的辩论继续进行,政策制定者应考虑将宗教医院与NFP分开考虑。宗教医院的管理人员应考虑他们增加的社区福利水平与他们的使命有何关系,并设定基准并认可和传达这些成就。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号