首页> 外文期刊>Helicobacter >Nonbismuth Quadruple (Concomitant) Therapy: Empirical and Tailored Efficacy versus Standard Triple Therapy for Clarithromycin- Susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus Sequential Therapy for Clarithromycin-Resistant Strains
【24h】

Nonbismuth Quadruple (Concomitant) Therapy: Empirical and Tailored Efficacy versus Standard Triple Therapy for Clarithromycin- Susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus Sequential Therapy for Clarithromycin-Resistant Strains

机译:非铋四联疗法(伴随疗法):针对克拉霉素-易感性幽门螺杆菌的经验和量身定制的疗效与标准三联疗法以及针对克拉霉素-耐药菌株的序贯疗法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Using quadruple clarithromycin-containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication is controversial with high rates of macrolide resistance. Aim: To evaluate antibiotic resistance rates and the efficacy of empirical and tailored nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy in a setting with cure rates <80% for triple and sequential therapies. Methods: 209 consecutive naive H. pylori-positive patients without susceptibility testing were empirically treated with 10-day concomitant therapy (proton pump inhibitors (PPI), amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg; all drugs b.i.d.). Simultaneously, 89 patients with positive H. pylori culture were randomized to receive triple versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori, and sequential versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains. Eradication was confirmed with 13C-urea breath test or histology 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Results: Per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat eradication rates after empirical concomitant therapy without susceptibility testing were 89% (95%CI:84-93%) and 87% (83-92%). Antibiotic resistance rates were: clarithromycin, 20%; metronidazole, 34%; and both clarithromycin and metronidazole, 10%. Regarding clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori, concomitant therapy was significantly better than triple therapy by per protocol [92% (82-100%) vs 74% (58-91%), p = 0.05] and by intention to treat [92% (82-100%) vs 70% (57-90%), p = 0.02]. As for antibiotic-resistant strains, eradication rates for concomitant and sequential therapies were 100% (5 / 5) vs 75% (3 / 4), for clarithromycin-resistant / metronidazole-susceptible strains and 75% (3 / 4) vs 60% (3 / 5) for dual-resistant strains. Conclusions: Empirical 10-day concomitant therapy achieves good eradication rates, close to 90%, in settings with multiresistant H. pylori strains. Tailored concomitant therapy is significantly superior to triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori and at least as effective as sequential therapy for resistant strains.
机译:背景:使用含克拉霉素的四联方案根除幽门螺杆菌存在争议,且对大环内酯类药物的耐药率很高。目的:在三联和序贯疗法的治愈率<80%的情况下,评估抗生素耐药率以及经验性和量身定制的非铋四联(伴随)疗法的疗效。方法:对209例未接受药敏试验的连续性单纯H.pylori阳性患者进行为期10天的伴随治疗(质子泵抑制剂(PPI),阿莫西林1 g,克拉霉素500 mg和甲硝唑500 mg;所有药物均为b.i.d.)。同时,将89例幽门螺杆菌培养阳性的患者随机分为两组,分别接受克拉霉素敏感性幽门螺杆菌的三联疗法和同期疗法,以及克拉霉素耐药菌株的序贯疗法和同期疗法。治疗结束8周后,通过13C-尿素呼气试验或组织学检查证实根除。结果:未进行药敏试验的经验伴随治疗后的按方案(PP)清除率和意向治疗率分别为89%(95%CI:84-93%)和87%(83-92%)。抗生素耐药率是:克拉霉素,20%;甲硝唑34%;克拉霉素和甲硝唑均为10%。对于克拉霉素敏感的幽门螺杆菌,按方案,伴随疗法显着优于三联疗法[92%(82-100%)vs 74%(58-91%),p = 0.05]和有意治疗[92% (82-100%)对70%(57-90%),p = 0.02]。至于抗生素耐药菌株,同时和序贯疗法的根除率为100%(5/5)对75%(3/4),对克拉霉素耐药/对甲硝唑敏感的菌株和75%(3/4)对60 %(3/5)对于双重耐药菌株。结论:在多耐药幽门螺杆菌菌株的环境中,经验性的10天伴随疗法可达到良好的根除率,接近90%。量身定制的伴随疗法明显优于克拉霉素敏感性幽门螺杆菌的三联疗法,并且至少与抗药性菌株的序贯疗法一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号