首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Chronic care improvement in primary care: Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes
【24h】

Chronic care improvement in primary care: Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes

机译:改善初级保健中的慢性护理:评估老年糖尿病患者按绩效付费和基于实践的综合护理协调计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To examine the effects of an intervention comprising (1) a practice-based care coordination program, (2) augmented by pay for performance (P4P) for meeting quality targets, and (3) complemented by a third-party disease management on quality of care and resource use for older adults with diabetes. Data Sources/Study Setting. Claims files of a managed care organization (MCO) for 20,943 adults aged 65 and older with diabetes receiving care in Alabama, Tennessee, or Texas, from January 2004 to March 2007. Study Design. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal study in which pre- and postdata from 1,587 patients in nine intervention primary care practices were evaluated against 19,356 patients in MCO comparison practices (>900). Five incentivized quality measures, two nonincentivized measures, and two resource-use measures were investigated. We examined trends and changes in trends from baseline to follow-up, contrasting intervention and comparison group member results. Principal Findings. Quality of care generally improved for both groups during the study period. Only slight differences were seen between the intervention and comparison group trends and changes in trends over time. Conclusions. This study did not generate evidence supporting a beneficial effect of an on-site care coordination intervention augmented by P4P and complemented by third-party disease management on diabetes quality or resource use.
机译:目的。要检查干预措施的效果,该干预措施包括(1)基于实践的护理协调计划,(2)为实现质量目标而按绩效付费(P4P)进行补充,以及(3)通过第三方疾病管理对患者的质量进行补充老年人糖尿病的保健和资源使用。数据源/研究设置。 2004年1月至2007年3月在阿拉巴马州,田纳西州或德克萨斯州为20,943名65岁及65岁以上的成年人接受糖尿病治疗的管理式护理组织(MCO)的索赔文件。研究设计。一项准实验性纵向研究,在MCO比较实践(> 900)中,对19,356名患者在9种干预性初级护理实践中的前后数据进行了评估。调查了五个激励质量措施,两个非激励措施和两个资源使用措施。我们检查了从基线到随访的趋势和趋势变化,对比了干预措施和对照组成员的结果。主要发现。在研究期间,两组的护理质量普遍得到改善。干预组和对照组之间的趋势以及趋势随时间的变化之间只有很小的差异。结论。这项研究没有证据支持通过P4P增强并辅以第三方疾病管理的现场护理协调干预对糖尿病质量或资源利用的有益作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号