...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation
【24h】

The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation

机译:定性方法在开发基于偏好的健康相关生活质量测量指标描述系统中的应用,以用于经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To describe how qualitative methods can be used in the development of descriptive systems of preference-based measures (PBMs) of health-related quality of life. Methods: The requirements of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and other agencies together with the increasing use of patient-reported outcome measures has led to an increase in the demand for PBMs. Recently, interest has grown in developing new PBMs and while previous research on PBMs has mainly focused on the methods of valuation, research into the methods of developing descriptive systems is an emerging field. Results: Traditionally, descriptive systems of PBMs were developed by using top-down methods, where content was derived from existing measures, the literature, or health surveys. A contrasting approach is a bottom-up methodology, which takes the views of patients or laypeople on how their life is affected by their health. This approach generally requires the use of qualitative methods. Qualitative methods lend themselves well to the development of PBMs. They also ensure that the measure has appropriate language, content validity, and responsiveness to change. While the use of qualitative methods in the development of non-PBMs is fairly standard, their use in developing PBMs was until recently nonexistent. Conclusions: In this article, we illustrate the use of qualitative methods by presenting two case studies of recently developed PBMs, one generic and one condition specific. We outline the stages involved, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the approach, and compare with the top-down approach used in the majority of PBMs to date.
机译:目的:描述定性方法如何用于开发与健康相关的生活质量的基于偏爱的量度(PBM)描述性系统。方法:国家卫生与临床卓越研究所和其他机构的要求以及患者报告的结局指标的增加使用导致对PBM的需求增加。近年来,人们对开发新的PBM的兴趣日益浓厚,尽管先前对PBM的研究主要集中在估值方法上,但对开发描述性系统的方法的研究却是一个新兴领域。结果:传统上,PBM的描述性系统是通过自上而下的方法开发的,其内容来自现有的措施,文献或健康调查。一种相反的方法是自下而上的方法,该方法从患者或外行人士的角度了解患者的生活如何受到健康的影响。这种方法通常需要使用定性方法。定性方法非常适合PBM的开发。他们还确保该措施具有适当的语言,内容有效性和对变更的响应能力。虽然在开发非PBM中使用定性方法是相当标准的,但是直到最近,在开发PBM中都没有使用定性方法。结论:在本文中,我们通过介绍最近开发的PBM的两个案例研究(一种通用和一种针对具体情况)来说明定性方法的使用。我们概述了所涉及的各个阶段,讨论了该方法的优缺点,并与迄今为止大多数PBM中使用的自上而下的方法进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号