首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Costo-Efectividad del Tratamiento de Salmeterol/Fluticasona en Comparacion con Leucotrieno Montelukast para el Control del Asma Infantil
【24h】

Costo-Efectividad del Tratamiento de Salmeterol/Fluticasona en Comparacion con Leucotrieno Montelukast para el Control del Asma Infantil

机译:沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗与白三烯孟鲁司特治疗儿童哮喘的成本效益比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of SFC compared with MON for the control of persistent asthma in children. Methods: We conducted an economic evaluation on a 12-week prospective randomized open-label parallel-group comparison of SFC versus MON in children with symptomatic asthma receiving inhaled cor-ticosteroids and short-acting beta2-agonists. Asthma-related medication, unscheduled physician contacts and hospitalizations were collected prospectively. The main effectiveness measure was percentage of asthma-controlled week with no short-acting beta2-agonist use during the study period. The analysis was conducted from the Mexican healthcare perspective using 2010 unit cost prices, and only direct costs were considered, all costs are reported in US dollar. . The model was made fully probabilistic to reflect the joint uncertainty in the model parameters. Results: Over the whole treatment period, the median percentages of asthma-controlled weeks were 83.3% in the SFC group and 66.7% in the MON group (SFC-MON difference, 16.7%; 95% CI, 8.3-16.7; P < 0.001 in favor of SFC). The mean total cost of the SFC regimenwas $ 2,323 compared with $ 3,230 for the MON regimen. The SFC was the dominant strategy (both more effective and less expensive) using the SFC was associated with an incremental cost per additional asthma-controlled of $ (5,467). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis tested numerous assumptions about the model cost and efficacy parameters and found that the results were robust to most changes. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that, compared with MON, SFC may be cost saving from the Mexican health care perspective for the treatment of pediatric patients with asthma. SFC provided a reduction in the number of severe exacerbations, frequent asthma symptoms and rescue medication use. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis indicated the dominance of SFC because of both lower costs and greater efficacy. Palabras Claucs: asma, costo/efectividad, montelukast, salmeterol/flu-ticasona.
机译:目的:评估SFC与MON相比在控制儿童持续性哮喘中增加的成本效益。方法:我们对接受吸入皮质类固醇和短效β2受体激动剂的有症状哮喘患儿的SFC与MON进行了为期12周的前瞻性随机开放标签平行分组比较,进行了经济评估。前瞻性收集与哮喘有关的药物,计划外的医生联系和住院治疗。主要有效性指标是研究期间未使用短效β2受体激动剂的哮喘控制周的百分比。该分析是从墨西哥医疗保健角度使用2010年单位成本价格进行的,仅考虑直接成本,所有成本均以美元报告。 。使模型具有充分的概率以反映模型参数中的联合不确定性。结果:在整个治疗期间,SFC组哮喘控制周的中位数百分比为83.3%,MON组为66.7%(SFC-MON差异为16.7%; 95%CI为8.3-16.7; P <0.001)赞成证监会)。 SFC方案的平均总成本为2,323美元,而MON方案为3,230美元。 SFC是主要策略(更有效且更便宜),使用SFC与每增加1哮喘控制费用相关的增量成本(5,467)。概率敏感性分析测试了有关模型成本和功效参数的众多假设,并发现结果对大多数更改都具有鲁棒性。结论:该分析表明,与MON相比,从墨西哥的医疗保健角度来看,SFC可以节省治疗小儿哮喘患者的费用。 SFC减少了严重加重次数,频繁的哮喘症状和急救药物的使用。成本效益增量分析表明,SFC的优势在于较低的成本和较高的功效。 Palabras Claucs:asma,costo / effectividad,孟鲁司特,沙美特罗/ flu-ticasona。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号