首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >A Critical Examination of the Arguments Against Raising the Car Driver Licensing Age in New Zealand
【24h】

A Critical Examination of the Arguments Against Raising the Car Driver Licensing Age in New Zealand

机译:批评审查反对提高新西兰的汽车驾驶员执照年龄的论点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: In 1987, to address an increasing problem of injury among young drivers, New Zealand chose a graduated driver licensing system (GDLS), in preference to raising the minimum car driver licensing age. Since 1987 the GDLS has contributed to a significant reduction in young driver injury, but a recent spate of high-profile crashes has raised public concern about young drivers and road safety. In response to this concern, a bill has been introduced into the parliament to increase the minimum driver licensing age from 15 to 16 years. In this article we critically examine some of the arguments against raising the licensing age. Our motivation for doing this is that many of the arguments against raising the driver's license age, though they have high face validity, are often presented without any supporting evidence. Method: Our sources for argument include Hansard (New Zealand parliament's official record), various public media, various agencies Web sites, census data, and published papers. The arguments examined against raising the age were the impact on the mobility of 15- and 16-year-olds, disadvantage to the rural sector, alternative transport options, increasing the age shifts the problem, changing the law will not change young driver behaviors, changing the law will not fix the problem, and education is the answer. Results: For each of the topics available, data were examined to quantify the extent to which these factors would affect young drivers if the minimum driver licensing age was raised to 16 years. Conclusion: The evidence demonstrates that young age, independent of experience, is a major determinant of risk; therefore, raising the minimum licensing age would have safety benefits. We also show that many of the arguments against raising the age are based on either no evidence or misinformation. Though raising the licensing age would to some extent disadvantage the rural sector, it may also be in the rural sector where the greatest gains in crash reduction are made.
机译:目标:1987年,为了解决年轻驾驶员中日益严重的伤害问题,新西兰选择了分级驾驶执照制度(GDLS),而不是提高最低汽车驾驶员执照年龄。自1987年以来,GDLS极大地减少了年轻驾驶员的伤害,但是最近发生的一系列高调撞车事故引起了公众对年轻驾驶员和道路安全的关注。针对这种担忧,议会已通过一项法案,将最低驾驶执照年龄从15岁提高到16岁。在本文中,我们严格审查了一些反对提高许可年龄的论点。我们这样做的动机是,许多反对提高驾驶执照年龄的论点尽管具有很高的面部有效性,但常常没有任何支持证据。方法:我们的论据来源包括《国会议事录》(新西兰议会的正式记录),各种公共媒体,各种机构的网站,人口普查数据和已发表的论文。反对提高年龄的论点包括对15岁和16岁流动性的影响,对农村部门的不利影响,替代性交通选择,增加年龄转移问题,更改法律不会改变年轻驾驶员的行为,修改法律不会解决问题,而教育就是答案。结果:对于每个可用主题,均检查了数据,以量化如果最低驾驶执照年龄提高到16岁,这些因素对年轻驾驶员的影响程度。结论:证据表明,不受经验影响的年龄是危险的主要决定因素。因此,提高最低许可年龄将带来安全利益。我们还表明,许多反对提高年龄的论点都是基于没有证据或错误信息的。尽管提高许可年龄会在一定程度上不利于农村部门,但也可能是在减少碰撞事故方面获得最大收益的农村部门。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号