首页> 外文期刊>Toxicon: An International Journal Devoted to the Exchange of Knowledge on the Poisons Derived from Animals, Plants and Microorganisms >The good, the bad and the ugly: Australian snake taxonomists and a history of the taxonomy of Australia's venomous snakes
【24h】

The good, the bad and the ugly: Australian snake taxonomists and a history of the taxonomy of Australia's venomous snakes

机译:好的,坏的和丑陋的:澳大利亚蛇类分类学家和澳大利亚毒蛇分类学的历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Australian snake fauna is unique in harbouring more venomous species than non-venomous ones. Although taxonomic research on the elapid snakes of Australia goes back to the late 18th century, in stark contrast to other developed regions of the world (e.g. the continental USA), Australian snake taxonomy is very much in its infancy. Despite this, or perhaps because of this, the taxonomy of Australian snakes has been extraordinarily controversial, and many of the taxonomists involved correspondingly colourful. In this review, we explore the sometimes-tortured history of the taxonomic exploration of the venomous snake fauna of Australia, looking at some of the more colourful and notable contributors and highlighting systematic pitfalls that persist even today.
机译:澳大利亚蛇类动物区系比无毒蛇类拥有更多有毒物种。尽管对澳大利亚蛇形蛇的分类学研究可以追溯到18世纪后期,但与世界其他发达地区(例如美国大陆)形成鲜明对比的是,澳大利亚蛇形分类学还处于起步阶段。尽管如此,或者也许正因为如此,澳大利亚蛇的分类学还是引起了极大的争议,许多分类学家也因此而感到困惑。在这篇评论中,我们探索了澳大利亚毒蛇动物分类学探索有时会遭受折磨的历史,着眼于一些更加丰富多彩和引人注目的贡献者,并强调了直到今天仍然存在的系统陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号