【24h】

Comparison of the Tougaard, ARXPS, RBS and ellipsometry methods to determine the thickness of thin SiO2 layers

机译:比较Tougaard,ARXPS,RBS和椭偏法确定薄SiO2层的厚度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Tougaard and angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) methods were compared with ellipsometry and Rutherford backscattering (RBS) for their ability to determine the amount Of SiO2 on an Si substrate. The Tougaard and ARXPS methods give generally consistent results (root-mean-square deviation similar to12%), whereas the deviation between the other techniques is significantly larger (similar to30-40%). The Tougaard method gives consistent results for all angles of emission theta less than or equal to 60degrees. It is found also that the amount of SiO2 determined by the two methods depends approximately linearly on the inelastic mean free path. The ARXPS method also depends on the accuracy with which one can separate the peak area of the bulk and the oxide part of the peaks. The correction for elastic scattering in the ARXPS method gives a reduction of only 5-7% in the determined amount Of SiO2. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd. [References: 22]
机译:将Tougaard和角度分辨X射线光电子能谱(ARXPS)方法与椭圆光度法和Rutherford反向散射(RBS)方法进行了比较,以确定它们在Si衬底上的SiO2含量。 Tougaard和ARXPS方法给出的结果通常是一致的(均方根偏差近似为12%),而其他技术之间的偏差则明显更大(近似30-40%)。对于所有小于或等于60度的发射角,Tougaard方法都给出了一致的结果。还发现通过两种方法确定的SiO 2的量大致线性地取决于非弹性平均自由程。 ARXPS方法还取决于可以将主体的峰面积与峰的氧化物部分分开的精度。在ARXPS方法中对弹性散射的校正仅使确定的SiO2量减少了5-7%。版权所有(C)2002 John Wiley Sons,Ltd. [引用:22]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号