Deriving parameters of a fundamental detachment model for cohesive soils from flume and jet erosion tests.

摘要

The erosion rate of cohesive soils is commonly quantified using the excess shear stress model, which is dependent on two major soil parameters: the critical shear stress ( tau _c) and the erodibility coefficient (k_d). A submerged jet test (jet erosion test, or JET) is one method that has been developed for measuring these parameters. The disadvantage of using the excess shear stress model is that parameters tau _c and k_d change according to erosion conditions, such as soil structure, soil orientation, type of clay, presence of roots, and seepage forces. A more mechanistically based detachment model, called the Wilson model, is proposed in this article for modeling the erosion rate of soils using hydraulic analysis of a JET. The general framework of the Wilson model is based on two soil parameters (b₀ and b₁). The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop methods of analysis of the JET to determine parameters b₀ and b₁ for the Wilson model in a similar fashion to the previous methodology developed for open-channel flow, and (2) compare the excess stress model parameter (k_d) and the Wilson model parameters (b₀ and b₁) determined from the flume tests and JETs for two cohesive soils. Flume tests, treated as the standard test method, and original and "mini" JETs were conducted on two soils to independently measure the excess shear stress model parameter (k_d) and the Wilson model parameters (b₀ and b₁). Soil samples of two cohesive soils (silty sand and clayey sand soils) were packed in a soil box for the flume tests and the JETs at water contents ranging from 8.7% to 18.1%. No statistically significant differences were observed for the excess shear stress model parameter (k_d) and for the Wilson model parameters (b₀ and b₁) when determined from the flume tests and JET devices, except for b₁ with the original JET. The Wilson model is advantageous in being a more mechanistic, fundamentally based erosion equation as compared to the excess shear stress model. The Wilson model can be used in place of the excess shear stress model with parameters that can be estimated using existing JET techniques.