首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrologic engineering >Suitability of a Linear Model for Predicting Cohesive Soil Detachment during Jet Erosion Tests
【24h】

Suitability of a Linear Model for Predicting Cohesive Soil Detachment during Jet Erosion Tests

机译:线性模型在射流侵蚀试验中预测粘性土分离的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cohesive soil detachment is a complex process that is typically simulated using simplified mathematical models such as the linear excess shear stress equation or power laws. The assumption of linearity between applied shear stresses and erosion rates has repeatedly been questioned, and several nonlinear models have been proposed as alternatives; however, recent studies demonstrated that over the limited range of tested shear stresses, nonlinear models did not describe erosion data significantly better than linear models did. Questions remain regarding the linearity of this relationship at higher ranges of applied shear stress. Laboratory mini jet erosion tests (JETs) were conducted on remolded samples of cohesive soils. A series of statistical tests were then performed to evaluate the suitability of a linear model for describing the relationship between applied shear stress and JET-derived erosion data. For most of the trials, the statistical analysis rejected the assumption of linearity between the erosion rate and applied shear stress. For certain trials, however, it was not possible to conclude on the nonlinearity of the erosion mechanism due to the limited number of erosion data points or the narrowness of the applied shear stress range. Additionally, even though the linear model could provide a good approximation of the erosion data derived using a standard in situ JET procedure typically limited to a narrow shear stress range, its extrapolation potential for prediction of erosion outside of the tested range is limited.
机译:粘性土的剥离是一个复杂的过程,通常使用简化的数学模型(例如线性超剪应力方程或幂定律)进行模拟。反复质疑外加剪切应力与侵蚀速率之间的线性关系的假设,并提出了几种非线性模型作为替代方案。然而,最近的研究表明,在有限的测试剪应力范围内,非线性模型不能比线性模型更好地描述侵蚀数据。在更高的剪切应力范围内,这种关系的线性仍然存在疑问。对粘性土壤的重塑样品进行了实验室微型喷射侵蚀试验(JET)。然后进行了一系列统计测试,以评估线性模型的适用性,该线性模型用于描述施加的切应力与JET得出的侵蚀数据之间的关系。对于大多数试验,统计分析都拒绝了腐蚀速率和施加的剪切应力之间线性关系的假设。但是,对于某些试验,由于腐蚀数据点的数量有限或所施加的剪切应力范围较窄,因此无法得出腐蚀机理的非线性的结论。此外,即使线性模型可以很好地近似使用标准的原位JET程序(通常限于狭窄的切应力范围)得出的腐蚀数据,但其在预测测试范围之外的腐蚀的外推潜力仍然有限。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of hydrologic engineering》 |2018年第9期|06018004.1-06018004.6|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Wisconsin, Environm Engn, 100 Ottensman Hall,1 Univ Plaza, Platteville, WI 53818 USA;

    North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, 127 Weaver Lab,Campus Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA;

    North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, 104 Weaver Adm Bldg.,Campus Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA;

    North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, 180 Weaver Lab,Campus Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号