首页> 外文期刊>Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association >A large multicenter correlation study of thyroid nodule cytopathology and histopathology.
【24h】

A large multicenter correlation study of thyroid nodule cytopathology and histopathology.

机译:甲状腺结节细胞病理学和组织病理学的大型多中心相关性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies are the cornerstone of preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules, but FNA diagnostic performance has varied across different studies. In the course of collecting thyroid FNA specimens for the development of a molecular diagnostic test, local cytology and both local and expert panel surgical pathology results were reviewed. METHODS: Prospective FNAs were collected at 21 clinical sites. Banked FNAs were collected from two academic centers. Cytology and corresponding local and expert panel surgical pathology results were compared to each other and to a meta-review of 11 recently published U.S.-based thyroid FNA studies. RESULTS: FNA diagnostic performance was comparable between the study specimens and the meta-review. Histopathology malignancy rates for prospective clinic FNAs were 34% for cytology indeterminate cases and 98% for cytology malignant cases, comparable to the figures found in the meta-review (34% and 97%, respectively). However, histopathology malignancy rates were higher for cytology benign cases in the prospective clinic FNA subcohort (11%) than in the meta-review (6%, with meta-review rates of 10% at community sites and 2% at academic centers, p < 0.0001). Resection rates for prospective clinic FNAs were also comparable to the meta-review for both cytology indeterminate cases (62% vs. 59%, respectively) and cytology malignant cases (82% vs. 81%, respectively). Surgical pathology categorical disagreement (benign vs. malignant diagnosis) was higher between local pathology and a consensus of the two expert panelists (11%) than between the two expert panelists both pre- (8%) and postconferral (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although recent guidelines for FNA biopsy and interpretation have been published, the rates of false-positive and false-negative results remain a challenge. Two-thirds of cytology indeterminate cases were benign postoperatively and may decrease with the development of an accurate molecular diagnostic test. High disagreement rates between local and expert panel histopathology diagnosis suggests that central review for surgical diagnoses should be used when developing diagnostic tests based on resected thyroid specimens.
机译:背景:细针穿刺活检是术前评估甲状腺结节的基石,但不同研究之间FNA的诊断性能有所不同。在收集甲状腺FNA标本进行分子诊断测试的过程中,对局部细胞学以及局部和专家组手术病理结果进行了回顾。方法:在21个临床地点收集了预期的FNA。银行提供的FNA是从两个学术中心收集的。将细胞学以及相应的局部和专家小组手术病理学结果相互比较,并与11个最近在美国发表的甲状腺FNA研究进行了荟萃综述。结果:FNA诊断性能在研究样本和meta审查之间是可比的。细胞学不确定病例的前瞻性临床FNAs的组织病理学恶性率为34%,细胞学恶性病例的组织病理学恶性率为98%,与荟萃评价中的数字相当(分别为34%和97%)。但是,前瞻性门诊FNA亚组的细胞学良性病例的组织病理学恶性率(11%)高于荟萃评价(6%,社区场所的荟萃评价为10%,学术中心为2%),p <0.0001)。对于细胞学不确定的病例(分别为62%和59%)和细胞学恶性病例(分别为82%和81%),前瞻性临床FNA的切除率也与Meta审查相当。局部病理学与两位专家小组成员的共识(11%)之间的手术病理学分类分歧(良性与恶性诊断)高于两位专家小组成员在手术前(8%)和会后(3%)。结论:尽管已经发布了有关FNA活检和解释的最新指南,但假阳性和假阴性结果的发生率仍然是一个挑战。细胞学不确定的病例中有三分之二在术后是良性的,并且随着精确分子诊断测试的发展可能会减少。局部和专家组组织病理学诊断之间的高异议率表明,在基于切除的甲状腺标本进行诊断测试时,应使用针对外科诊断的集中检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号