...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED.
【24h】

The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED.

机译:Alvarado使用临床评分系统决定对ED中的急性阑尾炎进行计算机断层扫描。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Appendicitis is part of the differential of an acute abdomen and can be a difficult diagnosis to make. Strategies to suggest which patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) should undergo computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm appendicitis have not been addressed. We develop guidelines for CT scanning based on Alvarado clinical scores for patients with suspected and confirmed cases of appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 150 charts of patients aged 7 and older who presented with abdominal pain to the ED of a 392-bed acute care facility over a 6-month period were evaluated by ED physicians and underwent CT to rule out appendicitis. Patient demographics, presenting signs, and symptoms were documented. Using the scoring system for appendicitis, developed by Alvarado, each chart was retrospectively scored. The Alvarado scores were correlated with positive pathology findings, as well as Alvarado scores with a negative CT scan. Equivocal scores, having neither high sensitivity nor specificity for appendicitis were calculated. RESULTS: Computed tomography scans with Alvarado scores of 3 or lower were performed in 37% (55/150) of patients to rule out appendicitis. The sensitivity of Alvarado scores 3 or lower for not having appendicitis was 96.2% (53/55), and the specificity 67% (2/3). Patients with Alvarado scores 7 or higher had an incidence of acute appendicitis of 77.7% (28/36). The sensitivity of Alvarado scores 7 or higher for appendicitis was 77% (28/36), and the specificity 100% (8/8). The sensitivity of equivocal Alvarado scores, defined as scores of 4 to 6, for acute appendicitis was 35.6% (21/59), and the specificity 94% (36/38). The sensitivity and specificity of CT scans in patients with equivocal Alvarado scores remained high, at 90.4% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the equivocal clinical presentation of appendicitis as defined by Alvarado scores of 4 to 6, adjunctive CT is recommended to confirm the diagnosis in the ED setting. If clinical presentation suggests acute appendicitis by an Alvarado score of 7 or higher, surgical consultation is recommended. Computed tomography is not indicated in patients with Alvarado scores of 3 or lower to diagnose acute appendicitis.
机译:研究目的:阑尾炎是急性腹部鉴别的一部分,可能难以诊断。尚未提出建议向急诊科(ED)出诊的哪些患者应进行计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描以确认阑尾炎的策略。我们根据Alvarado临床评分为疑似和确诊的阑尾炎患者制定CT扫描指南。方法:由ED医师评估了150张7岁及以上患者的图表,这些患者在6个月的时间里在392张病床的急诊室急诊室出现腹部疼痛,并进行了CT检查以排除阑尾炎。记录患者的人口统计资料,症状和体征。使用Alvarado开发的阑尾炎评分系统,对每个图表进行回顾性评分。 Alvarado评分与病理结果阳性相关,而CT扫描阴性则与Alvarado评分相关。计算出对阑尾炎既不具有高敏感性也不具有特异性的模棱两可的分数。结果:37%(55/150)的患者进行了Alvarado评分为3或更低的计算机断层扫描,以排除阑尾炎。未患有阑尾炎的Alvarado得分3或更低的敏感性为96.2%(53/55),特异性为67%(2/3)。 Alvarado评分为7或更高的患者发生急性阑尾炎的发生率为77.7%(28/36)。阑尾炎的Alvarado评分7或更高的敏感性为77%(28/36),特异性为100%(8/8)。明确的Alvarado评分对急性阑尾炎的敏感性为4到6,其敏感性为35.6%(21/59),特异性为94%(36/38)。 Alvarado评分不明确的患者的CT扫描敏感性和特异性仍然很高,分别为90.4%和95%。结论:在Alvarado评分为4至6所定义的阑尾炎临床表现不明确的情况下,建议使用辅助CT来确诊ED。如果临床表现提示急性阑尾炎的Alvarado评分为7或更高,建议进行外科手术咨询。 Alvarado评分为3或更低的患者不能进行计算机断层扫描以诊断急性阑尾炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号