...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Prognostic Value of the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction Score for 1-Year Mortality in 30-Day Survivors Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Acute Myocardial Infarction
【24h】

Prognostic Value of the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction Score for 1-Year Mortality in 30-Day Survivors Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Acute Myocardial Infarction

机译:年龄,肌酐和射血分数对30岁幸存者在急性心肌梗死后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的1年死亡率的预后价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Few simple and effective tools are available for determining the prognosis of 30-day survivors after acute myocardial infarction. We aimed to assess whether the simple age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score could predict 1-year mortality of 12,000 post myocardial infarction 30-day survivors who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. The ACEF score was computed as follows: (age/ejection fraction) + 1, if the serum creatinine was >2 mg/dl. Accuracy was defined through receiver-operating characteristics analysis and area under the curve (AUC) evaluation. Twelve risk factors were selected and ranked according to their AUC value. Age, ejection fraction, and serum creatinine levels indicated the best AUC value. The ACEF score was significantly higher in the non-survivors (1.95 +/- 0.82 vs 1.28 +/- 0.50; p <0.001) and was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.26; p <0.001). The best accuracy was achieved by a prediction model including 12 risk factors (AUC = 0.80), but this did not significantly differ compared with the AUC (0.79) of the ACEF score (p = ns). Adjusted hazard ratios for 1-year mortality were 1 (reference), 3.11 (p <0.001), and 10.38 (p <0.001) for the ACEF(LOW) (ACEF score <1.0), ACEF(MID) (ACEF score 1.0 to 1.39), and ACEF(HIGH) (ACEF score >= 1.4) groups, respectively. The ACEF score may be a novel valid model to stratify the 1-year mortality risk in 30-day survivors who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:很少有简单有效的工具可用于确定急性心肌梗死后30天生存者的预后。我们旨在评估单纯年龄,肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)分数是否可以预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的30天存活心肌梗死后12,000的1年死亡率。 ACEF分数的计算如下:(年龄/射血分数)+1,如果血清肌酐> 2 mg / dl。通过接收器操作特性分析和曲线下面积(AUC)评估来定义精度。选择了12个风险因素,并根据其AUC值对其进行排名。年龄,射血分数和血清肌酐水平表明最佳AUC值。非幸存者的ACEF评分显着更高(1.95 +/- 0.82对1.28 +/- 0.50; p <0.001),并且是1年死亡率的独立预测因子(调整后的危险比2.26; p <0.001)。通过包含12个风险因素的预测模型(AUC = 0.80)可获得最佳准确性,但与ACEF分数的AUC(0.79)相比(p = ns)并没有显着差异。对于ACEF(低)(ACEF得分<1.0),ACEF(MID)(ACEF得分1.0至1.0),调整为1年死亡率的危险比分别为1(参考),3.11(p <0.001)和10.38(p <0.001)和10.38(p <0.001)。 1.39)和ACEF(HIGH)(ACEF得分> = 1.4)组。 ACEF评分可能是一种新颖有效的模型,可以对急性心肌梗死后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的30天幸存者的1年死亡风险进行分层。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号