首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >The Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction Score to Risk Stratify Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion
【24h】

The Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction Score to Risk Stratify Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

机译:年龄,肌酐和射血分数得分可对接受冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者进行风险分层

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score predict clinical outcomes in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of nonocclusive coronary stenoses. We aimed at assessing the prognostic value of the ACEF score in patients who underwent successful PCI of chronic total occlusion (CTO). ACEF score was calculated in 587 patients treated with PCI of CTO: successful in 433 (74%; success group) and failed in 154 patients (26%; failure group). Patients Were divided in ACEF tertiles: first <0.950, second from 0.950 to 1.207, and third ACEF tertile >1.207. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE = overall death + nonfatal myocardial infarction + clinically driven target vessel revascularization) were assessed in 558 patients (95%) up to 24 months (8 to 24 months). In success group, higher MACE rate was significantly associated with increasing ACEF tertile (first = 7%, second = 13%, third ACEF = 18%, p = 0.02). MACE-free survival was significantly decreased with increasing ACEF tertile (log-rank 5.58, p = 0.018). In the failure group, lower MACE rate was significantly associated with increasing ACEF tertile (p = 0.041). This was mainly driven by significant decreasing rate of target vessel revascularization along the tertiles (first = 34%, second = 19%, third ACEF = 10%, p = 0.007). Compared with success group, in failure group, MACE rate was significantly higher in the first tertile (p <0.001) and similar in the third tertile (p = 0.59). In conclusion, ACEF score represents a simple tool in the prognostication of patients successfully treated with PCI of CTO and identifies those patients who would not derive any significant clinical harm despite failed percutaneous revascularization of the CTO. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:年龄,肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分可预测接受非阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的临床结局。我们旨在评估ACEF评分在接受慢性完全闭塞(CTO)成功PCI的患者中的预后价值。在587例接受CTO PCI治疗的患者中计算了ACEF评分:433例成功(74%;成功组),154例失败(26%;失败组)失败。将患者分为ACEF三分位数:第一位<0.950,第二位从0.950至1.207,第三位ACEF三分位数> 1.207。在558例(95%)至24个月(8至24个月)的患者中评估了主要的不良心脏事件(MACE =总死亡+非致命性心肌梗塞+临床驱动的靶血管血运重建)。在成功组中,较高的MACE率与ACEF三分位数的增加显着相关(第一= 7%,第二= 13%,第三ACEF = 18%,p = 0.02)。随着ACEF三分位数的增加,无MACE的存活率显着降低(对数秩5.58,p = 0.018)。在失败组中,较低的MACE率与ACEF三分位数的增加显着相关(p = 0.041)。这主要是由于沿三分位数的目标血管血运重建率显着下降(第一= 34%,第二= 19%,第三ACEF = 10%,p = 0.007)。与成功组相比,在失败组中,第一三分位数的MACE率显着更高(p <0.001),而第三三分位数的MACE率相似(p = 0.59)。综上所述,ACEF评分代表着一种简单的工具,可以成功预测CTO的PCI患者的预后,并且可以识别出尽管CTO的经皮血运重建失败但不会产生任何重大临床损害的患者。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号