首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Meta-Analysis of Large-Scale Randomized Trials to Determine the Effectiveness of Inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System in Heart Failure
【24h】

Meta-Analysis of Large-Scale Randomized Trials to Determine the Effectiveness of Inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System in Heart Failure

机译:大型随机试验的荟萃分析,以确定心力衰竭中肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的抑制作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition is 1 of the most effective strategies for the management of heart failure with reduced systolic function. However, trials that included patients with preserved systolic function have not shown a clear beneficial effect. Pooling evidence from several heart failure trials provides the opportunity to better assess the differential effects of RAAS inhibition across the continuum of systolic function. The authors searched MEDLINE for large-scale trials published from 1966 to March 2014 that compared RAAS inhibitors against placebos. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were conducted in heart failure populations with either clinical signs of heart failure or reduced ejection fractions. Inverse variance weighted fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to pool outcomes of interest, with metaregression used to test for trends. In 16 trials with 54,621 randomized heart failure participants, RAAS inhibition reduced the risks for hospitalization for heart failure by 20% (relative risk [RR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.83), cardiovascular mortality by 14% (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.90), and all-cause mortality by 11% (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92). However, proportional effects decreased with increasing mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for all outcomes (p for trend <0.01). Although there was no significant proportional effect on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in trials with a mean LVEF >50%, RAAS inhibition was still found to decrease the risk for heart failure hospitalization in patients with preserved LVEFs (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.97). In conclusion, the relative beneficial effects of RAAS inhibition in heart failure decreases with increasing left ventricular systolic function. Nonetheless, RAAS inhibition significantly reduces the risks for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients with moderately reduced LVEFs and the incidence of hospitalization in patients with preserved left ventricular function. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:抑制肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)是治疗收缩功能降低的心力衰竭最有效的策略之一。但是,包括收缩功能保留的患者在内的试验尚未显示出明显的有益作用。汇总来自几项心力衰竭试验的证据,可以更好地评估整个收缩功能连续期间对RAAS抑制的不同作用。作者在MEDLINE中搜索了1966年至2014年3月发表的大规模试验,该试验比较了RAAS抑制剂与安慰剂。如果研究是在具有心力衰竭临床症状或射血分数降低的心力衰竭人群中进行的,则符合纳入条件。使用方差逆加权固定效应荟萃分析来汇总感兴趣的结果,并使用元回归来检验趋势。在针对54,621名随机心力衰竭参与者的16项试验中,抑制RAAS可以使因心力衰竭住院的风险降低20%(相对风险[RR] 0.80,95%置信区间[CI] 0.77至0.83),心血管死亡率降低14%(RR 0.86,95%CI为0.83至0.90),全因死亡率为11%(RR 0.89,95%CI 0.85至0.92)。然而,对于所有结局,随着平均左室射血分数(LVEF)的增加,比例效应降低(趋势<0.01的p值)。尽管平均LVEF> 50%的试验对心血管和全因死亡率没有显着的比例影响,但仍发现RAAS抑制可降低保留LVEF的患者发生心衰住院的风险(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.80至0.97)。总之,RAAS抑制对心力衰竭的相对有益作用随左心室收缩功能的增加而降低。但是,RAAS抑制可显着降低LVEF降低的患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡的风险,以及保留左心室功能的患者的住院率。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号