...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >Gastrointestinal side effects of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis: results of the Etoricoxib versus Diclofenac Sodium Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Effectiveness (EDGE) trial.
【24h】

Gastrointestinal side effects of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis: results of the Etoricoxib versus Diclofenac Sodium Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Effectiveness (EDGE) trial.

机译:依托考昔对骨关节炎患者的胃肠道副作用:依托考昔与双氯芬酸钠胃肠道耐受性和有效性(EDGE)试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:. To compare the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, safety, and efficacy of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: In total, 7111 patients (mean age 64 yrs) diagnosed with OA were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received etoricoxib 90 mg qd (n = 3593) or diclofenac sodium 50 mg tid (n = 3518). Gastroprotective agents and low-dose aspirin were prescribed per treatment guidelines. The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of discontinuations due to clinical and laboratory GI adverse experiences (AE). General safety was assessed, including adjudication of thrombotic cardiovascular (CV) safety data. Efficacy was evaluated using the least-square (LS) mean change from baseline patient global assessment of disease status (PGADS; 0-4 point scale). RESULTS: Mean (SD, maximum) duration of treatment was 9.3 (4.4, 16.5) and 8.9 (4.5, 16.6) months in the etoricoxib and diclofenac groups, respectively. The cumulative discontinuation rate due to GI AE was significantly lower with etoricoxib than diclofenac [9.4 vs 19.2 events per 100 patient-years (PY), respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.43, 0.58; p < 0.001). Rates of thrombotic CV events were similar with etoricoxib and diclofenac [1.25 vs 1.15 events per 100 PY, respectively; HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.65, 1.74)]. The incidence of patients who discontinued due to hypertension-related AE was significantly higher with etoricoxib compared to diclofenac (2.3% vs 0.7%; p < 0.001), although few AE were severe (3 etoricoxib, 1 diclofenac). Etoricoxib and diclofenac treatment resulted in similar improvements in PGADS from baseline of -0.78 (95% CI -0.80, -0.75) and -0.75 (95% CI -0.77, -0.72), respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with etoricoxib 90 mg was associated with significantly better GI tolerability compared to diclofenac in this population of patients with OA. Etoricoxib 90 mg, a dose 50% higher than indicated for OA, resulted in more discontinuations due to hypertension-related AE.
机译:目的:。为了比较依托昔布和双氯芬酸在骨关节炎(OA)患者中的胃肠道(GI)耐受性,安全性和疗效。方法:总共有7111名被确诊为OA的患者(平均年龄64岁)参加了一项随机,双盲试验。患者接受依托考昔90 mg qd(n = 3593)或双氯芬酸钠50 mg tid(n = 3518)。根据治疗指南开胃保护剂和小剂量阿司匹林。主要终点是由于临床和实验室胃肠道不良经历(AE)而终止治疗的累积发生率。评估了总体安全性,包括判定血栓性心血管(CV)安全性数据。使用与基线患者总体疾病状况评估(PGADS; 0-4分制)相比的最小二乘(LS)平均变化评估疗效。结果:依托昔布和双氯芬酸组的平均(SD,最大)治疗时间分别为9.3(4.4、16.5)和8.9(4.5、16.6)个月。依托昔布的GI AE累积停药率显着低于双氯芬酸[分别为每100个患者-年(PY)9.4对19.2事件;危险比(HR)0.50(95%CI 0.43,0.58; p <0.001)。依托昔布和双氯芬酸的血栓性CV事件发生率相似[每100 PY分别为1.25和1.15事件; HR 1.07(95%CI 0.65,1.74)。与双氯芬酸相比,依托洛昔布因高血压相关不良事件而中止的患者发生率明显高于双氯芬酸(2.3%vs 0.7%; p <0.001),尽管严重的不良事件很少(三依托昔布,1双氯芬酸)。依托昔布和双氯芬酸治疗分别使PGADS相对于基线分别为-0.78(95%CI -0.80,-0.75)和-0.75(95%CI -0.77,-0.72)有所改善。结论:在这组OA患者中,与双氯芬酸相比,使用依托昔布90 mg治疗与胃肠道耐受性明显好于双氯芬酸。依托昔布90 mg,比OA指示剂量高50%的剂量,由于与高血压相关的AE而导致更多停药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号