首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Management of major pancreatic duct injuries in children.
【24h】

Management of major pancreatic duct injuries in children.

机译:儿童主要胰管损伤的处理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The operative versus nonoperative management of major pancreatic ductal injuries in children remains controversial. The computed tomographic (CT) scan may not be accurate for determination of location and type of injury. We report our experience with ductal injury including the recent use of acute endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for definitive imaging, and an endoscopically placed stent as definitive treatment. This has not been reported in children. METHODS: In review of 14,245 admissions to a regional pediatric trauma center over a 14-year period, 18 patients with major ductal injuries from blunt trauma were noted. Records were reviewed for mechanism of injury, method of diagnosis, management, and outcome. RESULTS: There were 10 girls and 8 boys, ranging in age from 2 months to 13 years. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle and bicycle crashes. Admission CT scan in 16 children was suggestive of injury in 11, and missed the injury in 5. Distal pancreatectomy was carried out in eight patients with distal duct injuries: one died of central nervous system injury. Nonoperative management in three proximal duct injuries suggested by initial CT scan and in three missed distal duct injuries resulted in pseudocyst formation in five survivors; one patient died of central nervous system injuries. Two children with minimal abdominal pain, normal initial serum amylase, and no initial imaging developed pseudocysts. Two of seven pseudocysts spontaneously resolved and five were treated by delayed cystogastrostomy. Two recent children with suggestive CT scans were definitively diagnosed by acute ERCP and treated by endoscopic stenting. Clinical and chemical improvement was rapid and complete and the stents were removed. Follow-up ERCP, CT scan, and serum amylase levels are normal 1 year after injury. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic ductal injuries are rare in pediatric blunt trauma. CT scanning is suggestive but not accurate for the diagnosis of type and location of injury. Acute ERCP is safe and accurate in children, and may allow for definitive treatment of ductal injury by stenting in selected patients. If stenting is not possible, or fails, distal injuries are best treated by distal pancreatectomy; proximal injuries may be managed nonoperatively, allowing for the formation and uneventful drainage of a pseudocyst.
机译:背景:儿童严重胰管损伤的手术治疗与非手术治疗仍存在争议。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描可能对于确定受伤的部位和类型不准确。我们报告了我们的导管损伤经验,包括最近使用急性内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)进行最终成像,以及内镜置入支架作为最终治疗方法。在儿童中尚未有报道。方法:回顾了14年间在一个区域小儿创伤中心的14,245例入院病例,发现18例因钝器外伤而引起的严重导管损伤。检查记录以了解损伤的机理,诊断方法,处理方法和结果。结果:有10名女孩和8名男孩,年龄从2个月到13岁不等。最常见的伤害机制是机动车和自行车撞车。 16例儿童入院CT扫描提示11例受伤,5例未受伤。8例远端导管损伤患者行胰远端切除术:1例中枢神经系统损伤死亡。初次CT扫描提示3例近端导管损伤的非手术治疗,以及3例漏失的远端导管损伤,导致5名幸存者形成假性囊肿。一名患者死于中枢神经系统伤害。两名儿童的腹部疼痛极小,初始血清淀粉酶正常,且无初始影像学检查,发展为假性囊肿。七个假性囊肿中的两个自然消退,五个经延迟膀胱造瘘术治疗。急性ERCP明确确诊了两名最近的CT扫描提示儿童,并经内镜支架置入术治疗。临床和化学方面的改善迅速而完整,并移除了支架。受伤后1年的随访ERCP,CT扫描和血清淀粉酶水平正常。结论:胰管损伤在小儿钝性创伤中很少见。 CT扫描对诊断损伤的类型和位置具有启发性,但不准确。急性ERCP对儿童是安全且准确的,并且可以通过在选定的患者中进行支架置入术来彻底治疗导管损伤。如果无法置入支架或支架置入失败,则最好通过远端胰腺切除术治疗远端受伤;可以通过非手术方式处理近端损伤,从而允许假性囊肿的形成和不规则引流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号