首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Selective use of cardiac computed tomography angiography: An alternative diagnostic modality before second-stage single ventricle palliation
【24h】

Selective use of cardiac computed tomography angiography: An alternative diagnostic modality before second-stage single ventricle palliation

机译:选择性使用心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影:第二阶段单心室缓解之前的另一种诊断方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Results: General anesthesiawas used for 16 of 16 cardiac catheterization studies and 1 of 16 computed tomography studies. Vascular access was central venous and/or arterial for all cardiac catheterization studies and a peripheral intravenous line for all computed tomography studies. Median age- and size-adjusted radiation dose was 14.0 mSv for cardiac catheterization and 1.1 mSv for computed tomography. Contrast dose was 4.8 mL/kg for the cardiac catheterization group and 2 mL/kg for the computed tomography group. There were no computed tomography discrepancies and 1 discrepancy between cardiac catheterization and surgical findings. There were 8 adverse events in 6 patients in the cardiac catheterization group and 1 adverse event in the computed tomography group. There was no difference between groups in postoperative course or need for repeat intervention.Conclusions: Cardiac computed tomography and cardiac catheterization are equally accurate for evaluation of anatomy before second-stage single ventricle palliation when compared with surgical findings. Computed tomography may be the preferred test in select patients because of decreased vascular access and anesthesia risk, lower radiation and contrast exposure, and fewer adverse events.Objectives: To assess the accuracy and risk of substituting cardiac computed tomography for cardiac catheterization in select patients for evaluation of anatomy before second-stage single ventricle palliation.Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive diagnostic cardiac catheterization (n = 16) and computed tomography studies (n = 16) performed before second-stage single ventricle palliation from March 2010 to July 2012 at a single institution. Risk (anesthesia, vascular access, contrast, and radiation exposure), accuracy, and postoperative course were compared. Nonparametric analysis was used to compare differences in group medians.
机译:结果:全麻用于16项心脏导管检查研究中的16项和16项计算机断层扫描研究中的1项。对于所有心脏导管检查研究,血管通路是中心静脉和/或动脉,而对于所有计算机断层摄影研究,血管通路是外周静脉线。年龄和尺寸调整后的辐射剂量中,心脏导管检查为14.0 mSv,计算机体层摄影术为1.1 mSv。心脏导管检查组的造影剂剂量为4.8 mL / kg,计算机体层摄影术组的造影剂剂量为2 mL / kg。没有计算机断层扫描的差异和心脏导管插入术和手术结果之间的差异。心脏导管插入术组中有6例患者发生8例不良事件,计算机断层扫描组中有1例不良事件。结论:心脏计算机断层扫描和心脏导管检查与手术结果相比,在评估第二阶段单心室舒张之前的解剖结构方面同样准确。在某些患者中,计算机断层扫描可能是首选的检查方法,因为血管通路和麻醉风险降低,放射线和造影剂暴露量更低,并且不良事件更少。方法:这是对2010年3月至7月连续进行的诊断性心脏导管插入术(n = 16)和计算机断层摄影术研究(n = 16)进行的回顾性回顾,该研究在第二阶段的单心室舒张之前进行。 2012年在单一机构任职。比较风险(麻醉,血管通路,对比和放射线暴露),准确性和术后病程。使用非参数分析来比较组中位数的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号