首页> 外文会议>PERFIK 2012 >Comparison of Effective Doses between Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography and Conventional Angiography at Pantai Hospital, Kuala Lumpur
【24h】

Comparison of Effective Doses between Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography and Conventional Angiography at Pantai Hospital, Kuala Lumpur

机译:吉隆坡Pantai医院计算断层摄影心脏血管造影与常规血管造影的效果比较

获取原文

摘要

This research studies two types of cardiac angiography procedures, namely Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) and Conventional Angiography (CA). The following research was executed to estimate the difference of mean effective doses that the patients received through both procedures. The mean dose-length-product (DLP) from CTCA and mean dose-area-product (DAP) from CA were utilized in calculating the effective doses.The result shows that the mean effective dose for CTCA and CA are 1.71±0.59 mSv and 53.25±14.22 mSv respectively. This proves that the mean effective dose received by patients undergoing CA is higher than patients undergoing CTCA. According to t-test, both procedures differ significantly, with a difference amounting to p<0.0001.The increases of the effective dose that the patients received through CA procedure were influenced by exposure time, the coronary anatomical condition, the operator's experience, and the operation methods.
机译:该研究研究了两种类型的心血管造影程序,即计算断层摄影心脏血管造影(CTCA)和常规血管造影(CA)。执行以下研究以估计通过这两种程序接受的平均有效剂量的差异。来自CTCA的平均剂量 - 长度 - 产物(DLP)来自CA的CA-型含量,用于计算有效剂量。结果表明,CTCA和CA的平均有效剂量为1.71±0.59msV和分别为53.25±14.22 msv。这证明了所接受CA患者接受的平均有效剂量高于接受CTCA的患者。根据T检验,这两种程序都有显着差异,差异为P <0.0001。通过CA程序接受的有效剂量的增加受暴露时间,冠状动脉解剖条件,操作员的经验影响的影响操作方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号