首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Affect Erectile Function Recovery in Patients Treated with Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
【24h】

Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Affect Erectile Function Recovery in Patients Treated with Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

机译:双侧保留神经根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术不会影响勃起功能的恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) might be associated with damages to the pelvic plexus, potentially affecting erectile function (EF) recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the impact of the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) on EF has never been addressed. Aim. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of ePLND on potency recovery in patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RP (BNSRP). Methods. The study included 396 patients with prostate cancer treated with BNSRP by two high-volume surgeons. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups based on PLND status: no PLND (N=161; 40.9%) and ePLND (N=235; 59.1%) at the time of BNSRP. All patients had preoperative functional and oncological data. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models tested the association between ePLND and EF recovery after surgery, after accounting for confounders. Main Outcome Measure. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used to evaluate EF after BNSRP. Postoperative EF recovery was defined as an IIEF-EF domain score ≥22. Results. At a mean follow up of 33.2 months after surgery (median 30), 183 patients (46.2%) recovered EF. Overall, postoperative EF recovery rate at 2 years was 48.4%. No significant differences were recorded when patients were stratified according to the extent of PLND (EF recovery rates at 2-year: 46.6% vs. 49.7% for patients who did not undergo PLND vs. those treated with ePLND; P=0.33). These results were confirmed at multivariable analyses, where only age at surgery and preoperative IIEF-EF (all P≤0.03), but not ePLND (P=0.8), represented independent predictors of EF recovery. Conclusions. The extent of PLND is not associated with potency after BNSRP. Conversely, other factors such as age at surgery and preoperative EF represent the major predictors of postoperative potency recovery. Therefore, when indicated, ePLND can be safely performed without compromising EF outcomes.
机译:介绍。扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)可能与盆腔神经丛受损有关,可能会影响根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后勃起功能(EF)的恢复。然而,骨盆淋巴结清扫术范围(PLND)对EF的影响尚未得到解决。目标。这项研究的目的是评估ePLND对接受双侧保留神经的RP(BNSRP)患者的效能恢复的影响。方法。该研究纳入了由两名大剂量外科医生用BNSRP治疗的396例前列腺癌患者。根据PLND状况将患者回顾性分为两组:BNSRP时无PLND(N = 161; 40.9%)和ePLND(N = 235; 59.1%)。所有患者均具有术前功能和肿瘤学资料。考虑到混杂因素后,单变量和多变量Cox回归模型测试了手术后ePLND与EF恢复之间的关联。主要结果指标。国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)用于评估BNSRP后的EF。术后EF恢复定义为IIEF-EF域评分≥22。结果。术后平均随访33.2个月(中位数30),有183例患者(46.2%)恢复了EF。总体而言,术后2年的EF恢复率为48.4%。当根据PLND的程度对患者进行分层时,没有发现显着差异(2年时EF的恢复率:46.6%,未接受PLND的患者与接受ePLND的患者相比为49.7%; P = 0.33)。这些结果在多变量分析中得到了证实,其中只有手术年龄和术前IIEF-EF(所有P≤0.03),而ePLND(P = 0.8)不是EF恢复的独立预测因子。结论。 PLND的程度与BNSRP后的效能无关。相反,其他因素(如手术年龄和术前EF)则是术后效能恢复的主要预测指标。因此,在指示时,可以安全地执行ePLND,而不会影响EF结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号