首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of school health >They were only joking: Efforts to decrease LGBTQ bullying and Harassment in Seattle public schools
【24h】

They were only joking: Efforts to decrease LGBTQ bullying and Harassment in Seattle public schools

机译:他们只是在开玩笑:努力减少西雅图公立学校的LGBTQ欺凌和骚扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Seattle Public Schools has implemented policies and programs to increase safety, family involvement, and student achievement for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth. This case study examines students' perceptions of bullying and harassment in the school environment, and teacher intervention when these problems arise in the presence of strong district policies and programs aimed at reducing LGBTQ bullying and harassment in schools. METHODS: We surveyed students in Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) groups at 13 secondary schools (N=107). We also conducted focus groups with GSA students and students not involved in the GSAs in 7 of 13 schools (N=16 groups, including 154 students). RESULTS: GSA students who were lesbian, gay, bisexual, or questioning (LGBQ) were significantly more likely than straight students to experience several types of harassment. On the basis of student report, the 2 most common intervention strategies by teachers for verbal harassment included stopping the harassment and explaining why it is wrong; teachers intervened in physical harassment by trying to stop the harassment. Students provided input on how to strengthen teacher interventions, including the need for more consistency in responding and following up. Students also noted a need for more focus on educating those who harass, rather than just asking them to stop. CONCLUSIONS: Seattle Public Schools has made great strides in creating safe and welcoming schools for LGBTQ students, but still have to work further toward reaching this goal. Data from students on how they experience their school environment can help identify areas for improvement.
机译:背景:西雅图公立学校已实施政策和计划,以提高女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,变性者和询问(LGBTQ)青年的安全性,家庭参与度和学生成绩。本案例研究考察了学生在学校环境中对欺凌和骚扰的理解,以及在存在旨在减少学校中LGBTQ欺凌和骚扰的强有力的地区政策和计划的情况下出现这些问题时的教师干预。方法:我们调查了13所中学(N = 107)的同性恋者直觉联盟(GSA)组的学生。我们还与GSA学生和未参与GSA的学生在13所学校中的7所进行了焦点小组讨论(N = 16组,包括154名学生)。结果:GSA学生中的同性恋,双性恋或询问(LGBQ)学生比异性恋学生遭受多种骚扰的可能性要大得多。根据学生的报告,教师针对言语骚扰的两种最常见的干预策略包括:停止骚扰并解释其原因;教师试图阻止骚扰来干预骚扰。学生提供了有关如何加强教师干预的意见,包括需要在回应和跟进方面保持更大的一致性。学生们还指出,需要更多地关注对骚扰者的教育,而不仅仅是要求他们停止骚扰。结论:西雅图公立学校在为LGBTQ学生创建安全和热情的学校方面取得了长足的进步,但仍必须进一步努力实现这一目标。来自学生的关于他们如何体验学校环境的数据可以帮助确定需要改进的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号