首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Emergency use of prethawed Group A plasma in trauma patients
【24h】

Emergency use of prethawed Group A plasma in trauma patients

机译:预先解冻的A组血浆在创伤患者中的紧急使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion protocols lead to increased use of the rare universal plasma donor, Type AB, potentially limiting supply. Owing to safety data, with a goal of avoiding shortages, our blood bank exploited Group A rather than AB for all emergency release plasma transfusions. We hypothesized that ABO-incompatible plasma transfusions had mortality similar to ABO-compatible transfusions. METHODS: Review of all trauma patients receiving emergency release plasma (Group A) from 2008 to 2011 was performed. ABO compatibility was determined post hoc. Deaths before blood typing were eliminated. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 254 patients, 35 (14%) received ABO-incompatible and 219 (86%) received ABO-compatible transfusions. There was no difference in age (56 years vs. 59 years), sex (63% vs. 63% male), Injury Severity Score (ISS) (25 vs. 22), or time spent in the trauma bay (24 vs. 26.5 minutes). Median blood product units transfused were similar: emergency release plasma (2 vs. 2), total plasma at 24 hours (6 vs. 4), total red blood cells at 24 hours (5 vs. 4), plasma-red blood cells at 24 hours (1.3:1 vs. 1.1:1), and plasma deficits at 24 hours (2 vs. 1). Overall complications were similar (43% vs. 35%) as were rates of possible transfusion-related acute lung injury (2.9% vs. 1.8%), acute lung injury (3.7% vs. 2.5%), adult respiratory distress syndrome (2.9% vs. 1.8%), deep venous thrombosis (2.9% vs. 4.1%), pulmonary embolism (5.8% vs. 7.3%), and death (20% vs. 22%). Ventilator (6 vs. 3), intensive care unit (4 vs. 3), and hospital days (9 vs. 7) were similar. There were no hemolytic reactions. Mortality was significantly greater for the patients who received incompatible plasma if concurrent with a massive transfusion (8% vs. 40%, p = 0.044). Group AB plasma use was decreased by 96.6%. CONCLUSION: Use of Group A for emergency release plasma resulted in ABO-incompatible transfusions; however, this had little effect on clinical outcomes. Blood banks reticent to adopt massive transfusion protocols owing to supply concerns may safely use plasma Group A, expanding the pool of emergency release plasma donors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV; prognostic study, level III.
机译:背景:大量输血方案导致罕见的通用血浆供体AB型的使用增加,可能限制供应。基于安全数据,为了避免短缺,我们的血库在所有紧急释放血浆输注中均采用A组而非AB组。我们假设不兼容ABO的血浆输注的死亡率与不兼容ABO的输血相似。方法:对2008年至2011年接受急救血浆(A组)的所有创伤患者进行回顾。事后确定了ABO兼容性。消除了血液分型前的死亡。 p <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在254例患者中,有35例(14%)接受了ABO不相容输注,其中219例(86%)接受了ABO相容输注。年龄(56岁对59岁),性别(63%对63%男性),伤害严重度评分(ISS)(25对22)或在创伤区度过的时间(24对vs.)无差异。 26.5分钟)。输血的中位数血液单位相似:紧急释放血浆(2对2),24小时总血浆(6对4),24小时总红细胞(5对4),血浆红细胞在24小时。 24小时(1.3:1比1.1:1),以及24小时血浆缺乏症(2比1)。总体并发症与可能发生的与输血相关的急性肺损伤(2.9%对1.8%),急性肺损伤(3.7%对2.5%),成人呼吸窘迫综合征(2.9%)的发生率相似(43%对35%)。 %vs. 1.8%),深静脉血栓形成(2.9%vs. 4.1%),肺栓塞(5.8%vs. 7.3%)和死亡(20%vs. 22%)。呼吸机(6 vs. 3),重症监护病房(4 vs. 3)和住院天数(9 vs. 7)相似。没有溶血反应。如果同时进行大量输血,接受不相容血浆的患者的死亡率明显更高(8%vs. 40%,p = 0.044)。 AB组血浆使用量减少了96.6%。结论:使用A组紧急释放血浆导致ABO不相容输血;但是,这对临床结果影响不大。由于供应方面的考虑而拒绝采取大规模输血方案的血库可能会安全地使用血浆A组,从而扩大了紧急释放血浆供体的库。证据级别:治疗研究,四级;预后研究,III级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号