首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of medicine and philosophy >Abortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.
【24h】

Abortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.

机译:堕胎,形而上学和道德:弗朗西斯·贝克威斯(Francis Beckwith)的捍卫生活回顾:反对堕胎选择的道德和法律案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice (2007) and an earlier article in this journal, "Defending Abortion Philosophically"(2006), Francis Beckwith argues that fetuses are, from conception, prima facie wrong to kill. His arguments are based on what he calls a "metaphysics of the human person" known as "The Substance View." I argue that Beckwith's metaphysics does not support his abortion ethic: Moral, not metaphysical, claims that are part of this Substance View are the foundation of the argument, and Beckwith inadequately defends these moral claims. Thus, Beckwith's arguments do not provide strong support for what he calls the "pro-life" view of abortion.
机译:弗朗西斯·贝克维斯(Francis Beckwith)在《捍卫生命:反对堕胎选择的道德和法律案例》(2007年)和该期刊的较早文章《从哲学上捍卫堕胎》(2006年)中,认为胎儿从概念上说是表面上看来是错误的杀戮。他的论据基于他所谓的“人的形而上学”,即“物质观”。我认为贝克威斯的形而上学不支持他的堕胎伦理:作为这种物质观点一部分的道德主张而不是形而上学的主张是争论的基础,贝克威斯没有为这些道德主张辩护。因此,贝克威斯的论点不能为他所谓的“赞成生命”的堕胎观点提供有力的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号