首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Use of Screws and Cement in Revision TKA With Primary or Revision Specific Prosthesis With Up to 17 Years Followup
【24h】

Use of Screws and Cement in Revision TKA With Primary or Revision Specific Prosthesis With Up to 17 Years Followup

机译:螺钉和水泥在TKA修复中的使用,主要针对或修复特定的假体,长达17年的随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use for screws and cement and primary and revision specific prosthesis for revision TKA. Between July 1989 and February 2010, 839 consecutive revision TKAs were performed, with 609 knees meeting inclusion criteria. At 17 years followup, Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 09859101 revision specific prosthesis with screws and cement, 0.9848 for revision prosthesis with no screws, 0.9118 for primary prosthesis with screws, and 0.9424 for primary prosthesis with no screws. Revision TKAs using screws had greater defects (P < .0001). Use of revision prosthesis along with screws and cement to correct largely defective revision TKAs is highly recommended. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究螺钉和水泥的使用以及TKA修订版的主要和特定版本的修复体。在1989年7月至2010年2月之间,连续进行了839次修订的TKA,其中609膝符合纳入标准。在17年的随访中,Kaplan-Meier的幸存者为:带螺丝和水泥的09859101特定修订版假体,不带螺丝的修订版假体为0.9848,带螺丝的主要假体为0.9118,不带螺丝的主要假体为0.9424。使用螺钉修订的TKA具有更大的缺陷(P <.0001)。强烈建议使用修复假体以及螺钉和水泥来纠正严重缺陷的修复TKA。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号