...
首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Complex regional pain syndrome type I: use of the international association for the study of pain diagnostic criteria defined in 1994.
【24h】

Complex regional pain syndrome type I: use of the international association for the study of pain diagnostic criteria defined in 1994.

机译:I型复杂区域性疼痛综合症:利用国际协会研究1994年定义的疼痛诊断标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the reported use in recent publications of the diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) in 1994. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE (January 1996 to July 2000) was performed with use of the medical subject heading reflex sympathetic dystrophy regional, Dutch were analyzed. From the search, 65 original publications were selected. Another 27 publications (referenced publications) that were referenced in the 65 original publications for the description of diagnostic criteria for CRPS I also were included. A standard form was used to assess a total of 92 publications. A sensitivity analysis was performed by means of analyzing three scenarios in which the diagnostic criteria were used as proposed and two combinations of less stringent criteria. RESULTS: Use of the diagnostic criterion pain was reported in 35 (38%) of the analyzed publications. None of the original publications satisfied the proposed IASP diagnostic criteria. Four (15%) of the referenced publications satisfied the proposed IASP diagnostic criteria. Ten (15%) of the original publications referred correctly to the referenced publications. With the less strict criteria used in scenarios 2 and 3, 2 (3%) and 3 (5%), respectively, of the original publications fulfilled these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: If the diagnostic criteria for CRPS I are not used uniformly, the populations in clinical studies may not be uniform either. Whether different authors are describing the same syndrome and whether their findings can be compared is open to question. On the basis of the results of this study, it is concluded that the IASP criteria for CRPS I are poorly used in clinical studies.
机译:目的:目的是评估国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)在1994年提出的I型复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS I)诊断标准的最新出版物中使用的方法。 MEDLINE(1996年1月至2000年7月)是利用医学受试者的标题反射性交感神经营养不良区域进行的,对荷兰人进行了分析。通过搜索,选择了65种原始出版物。在65篇原始出版物中还引用了另外27篇出版物(参考出版物)来描述CRPS I的诊断标准。使用标准表格评估了总共92种出版物。通过分析三种情况(其中建议使用诊断标准)和不太严格的标准的两种组合来进行敏感性分析。结果:在分析的出版物中,有35篇(38%)报道了使用诊断标准疼痛的方法。原始出版物都没有满足建议的IASP诊断标准。参考的出版物中有四个(15%)满足了建议的IASP诊断标准。原始出版物中有十个(15%)正确引用了参考出版物。由于场景2和场景3中使用的标准不太严格,分别有2(3%)和3(5%)的原始出版物满足了这些条件。结论:如果没有统一使用CRPS I的诊断标准,则临床研究中的人群也可能不一致。是否有不同的作者在描述同一综合症以及他们的发现是否可以比较尚有待商question。根据这项研究的结果,可以得出结论,临床研究中很少使用IASP CRPS I标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号